A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
- Some Schmo
- God
- Posts: 4051
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:21 am
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
So ah... who's been bullied off the board again? Just curious who the victim(s) is/are here.
Note: I have HOH on ignore. He may have explained it in his posts, but given what I know of his posting habits, I doubt it. All I know is that anyone who's ever posted here and still wants to does still post here.
Note: I have HOH on ignore. He may have explained it in his posts, but given what I know of his posting habits, I doubt it. All I know is that anyone who's ever posted here and still wants to does still post here.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense. It's also the favored cover for hypocrites.
The god idea is popular with desperate people.
The god idea is popular with desperate people.
- Hound of Heaven
- God
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
So, on the Rules and Moderator thread yesterday Marcus the Carcass made some interesting points while complaining to Shades. She talks about how I level the same insults across multiple threads, but as we can see on this thread, i have now proven that she herself has leveled insults and personal attacks across multiple threads for at least 7 months in a row against one particular individual, apparently she's ok with personal attacks if she's the one attacking, it's just not acceptable when other board members do it!
She then goes on to tell Shades that "There are also many more REPETITIVE attacks" that i have made, and, as we can see in the evidence I've presented, she's ok with repetitive attacks as long as she's the one doing the attacking!
Here's two screenshots, one from the Moderator board where Marcus the Carcass is being a total hypocrite! And one more of many screenshots showing she's perfectly fine with repetitive attacks as long as she's the one doing the attacking!!
She actually says that MG2.0 is getting what he deserves when being repetitively attacked by her and Wang Dumb!
Honestly, take a look at these two screenshots!! Look back at the screenshots I posted on page one, this is the definition of a 100% pure hypocrite that will say anything to get her way!! Please, someone prove me wrong!!


She then goes on to tell Shades that "There are also many more REPETITIVE attacks" that i have made, and, as we can see in the evidence I've presented, she's ok with repetitive attacks as long as she's the one doing the attacking!
Here's two screenshots, one from the Moderator board where Marcus the Carcass is being a total hypocrite! And one more of many screenshots showing she's perfectly fine with repetitive attacks as long as she's the one doing the attacking!!
She actually says that MG2.0 is getting what he deserves when being repetitively attacked by her and Wang Dumb!
Honestly, take a look at these two screenshots!! Look back at the screenshots I posted on page one, this is the definition of a 100% pure hypocrite that will say anything to get her way!! Please, someone prove me wrong!!


- Hound of Heaven
- God
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
Here's an example of Marcus the Carcass asking a board member if they think it's ok for them to break the rules!! I would like to ask Marcus the Carcass if she thinks it's ok for her to break the rules?? I mean, the evidence shows she is willing to follow MG2.0 around to multiple threads for 7 or 8 months, using personal attacks to try to run him off the board!!
Multiple threads, the same attack, over and over and over and over and over and over and over!! Marcus, isn't there a rule that says no personal attacks? Is there an exemption for you, Marcus the Carcass? Maybe it's because you feel MG2.0 deserves being attacked, that's what you said, look at the post above, you said he deserves it!! Can i use that excuse? Because I think certain people on this board deserve to be attacked! Can we both be exempt together??



Multiple threads, the same attack, over and over and over and over and over and over and over!! Marcus, isn't there a rule that says no personal attacks? Is there an exemption for you, Marcus the Carcass? Maybe it's because you feel MG2.0 deserves being attacked, that's what you said, look at the post above, you said he deserves it!! Can i use that excuse? Because I think certain people on this board deserve to be attacked! Can we both be exempt together??



- Doctor CamNC4Me
- God
- Posts: 11115
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.

It’s funny how one can ascertain what time and time zone the perpetually aggrieved snowflake begins ranting in the morning. Like, Atlantic Michelle must wake up screaming every morning, haha.
Hiring a part-time news entertainment anchor as SecDef, what could go wrong?
- Hound of Heaven
- God
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
Ok, we're still going to discuss MG2.0 and how he was bullied off the board, but I want to add discussion about someone else who was bullied off the board and once again the history search on the board proves that Marcus the Carcass was front and center, right there till the end, bullying doubtingthomas off the board!
Let's first keep in mind how over a 7 month period starting in 2025 into 2026, Marcus the Carcass along with her buddies constantly and consistently called MG2.0 a fibber, fibbing gymnast, fibber gymnast and she believed he deserved the personal attacks that she and others constantly hurled at him 100s of times over a 7 month period!
Now, before reading this next screenshot of Marcus asking a moderator about doubtingthomas's personal attacks against other board members, everyone take the time to review the evidence on page 1 and this page, the evidence that shows Marcus the Carcass is perfectly fine with personal attacks, breaking the rules, as long as she's the one hurling the attacks!
Now, read this exchange between her and a moderator! Am I the only one that thinks this is hypocritical of her? I mean, maybe doubtingthomas felt the people he was attacking deserved it. Doesn't that exempt him, Marcus the Carcass? I think I'm providing evidence that you feel you're exempt and have the freedom to hurl personal attacks as long as the attacks are deserved. Am i wrong?

After reading the screenshot above, Marcus the Carcass, should threads you hurled personal attacks in at MG2.0 be moved the same as you're asking for threads to be moved if doubtingthomas is hurling personal attacks?
Let's first keep in mind how over a 7 month period starting in 2025 into 2026, Marcus the Carcass along with her buddies constantly and consistently called MG2.0 a fibber, fibbing gymnast, fibber gymnast and she believed he deserved the personal attacks that she and others constantly hurled at him 100s of times over a 7 month period!
Now, before reading this next screenshot of Marcus asking a moderator about doubtingthomas's personal attacks against other board members, everyone take the time to review the evidence on page 1 and this page, the evidence that shows Marcus the Carcass is perfectly fine with personal attacks, breaking the rules, as long as she's the one hurling the attacks!
Now, read this exchange between her and a moderator! Am I the only one that thinks this is hypocritical of her? I mean, maybe doubtingthomas felt the people he was attacking deserved it. Doesn't that exempt him, Marcus the Carcass? I think I'm providing evidence that you feel you're exempt and have the freedom to hurl personal attacks as long as the attacks are deserved. Am i wrong?

After reading the screenshot above, Marcus the Carcass, should threads you hurled personal attacks in at MG2.0 be moved the same as you're asking for threads to be moved if doubtingthomas is hurling personal attacks?
- Doctor CamNC4Me
- God
- Posts: 11115
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
Haha, here we have an example of Trump’s super intelligence, 
Hiring a part-time news entertainment anchor as SecDef, what could go wrong?
- canpakes
- God
- Posts: 10673
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
DT was suspended for deploying multiple sock accounts, intentional misquoting and targeted sexual harassment. One or more of these same behaviors has resulted in Whiskey/Binger accounts and a dozen Atlantic Mike clones to be suspended.
Given these histories, it makes sense that the remaining MAGA-aligned socks here have been in a state of extended public whining and mourning over the removal of those accounts.
Given these histories, it makes sense that the remaining MAGA-aligned socks here have been in a state of extended public whining and mourning over the removal of those accounts.
- Hound of Heaven
- God
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm
-
Marcus
- God
- Posts: 8088
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: A Case Study On Marcus, Wang Chung, Canpakes And Others Bullying Members Off The Board.
Thanks for the history reminder.canpakes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2026 2:04 pmDT was suspended for deploying multiple sock accounts, intentional misquoting and targeted sexual harassment. One or more of these same behaviors has resulted in Whiskey/Binger accounts and a dozen Atlantic Mike clones to be suspended.
Given these histories, it makes sense that the remaining MAGA-aligned socks here have been in a state of extended public whining and mourning over the removal of those accounts.
One thing that really surprises me is the Atlanticmike / HoundofHeaven sock puppet issue. When Atlanticmike last posted here, he acknowledged that he was on queue, and a mod confirmed it:
Atlanticmike then started many, many sock puppets, finally settling on Hound of Heaven. Even though there is overwhelming evidence of this rule-breaking move, Hound is allowed to post in all forums. I'd really like to hear from Shades why he allows Atlantic Mike to bypass the queue restriction he was under by breaking the sock puppet rule.
Is it because he doubts HoH is Atlanticmike? The evidence is overwhelming that these two accounts are run by the same person.
