It amuses me that MAGAtes are using the exact arguments made against them when they were whining about cancel culture.
Hmph. So they were paying attention. They just lied about agreeing, because context. Shocker.
Imagine being so damn deaf to tone and substance that you did not hear the effing megaphone, "WE ACCEPT YOUR F******* CONDITIONS!!!!!!"
There were some that tried to give warnings. But, nah. Did not matter. I am telling ya, that Alex Jones suit is going to bite someone in the arse bad. Real bad. Very bad. Sinclair knows. They don't want it to be them.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
It amuses me that MAGAtes are using the exact arguments made against them when they were whining about cancel culture.
Hmph. So they were paying attention. They just lied about agreeing, because context. Shocker.
Imagine being so damn deaf to tone and substance that you did not hear the effing megaphone, "WE ACCEPT YOUR F******* CONDITIONS!!!!!!"
There were some that tried to give warnings. But, nah. Did not matter. I am telling ya, that Alex Jones suit is going to bite someone in the arse bad. Real bad. Very bad. Sinclair knows. They don't want it to be them.
Yeah, you're fun to ignore.
See ya.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense.
Imagine being so damn deaf to tone and substance that you did not hear the effing megaphone, "WE ACCEPT YOUR F******* CONDITIONS!!!!!!"
There were some that tried to give warnings. But, nah. Did not matter. I am telling ya, that Alex Jones suit is going to bite someone in the arse bad. Real bad. Very bad. Sinclair knows. They don't want it to be them.
Yeah, you're fun to ignore.
See ya.
Ignorance is bliss. They say that. They say ignorance is bliss. Merry Blissmas.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
I agree with Whiskey that we should ban all of those he mentioned that we should be ban, but not for the stated reasons. The reason is that they've all harassed and attacked the honorable forum members here repeatedly, including myself, and create a risk for all of us. My life doesn't need to be in jeopardy just because those you listed can't control their anger. I call upon the mods to ban all of them.
I agree with Whiskey that we should ban all of those he mentioned that we should be ban, but not for the stated reasons. The reason is that they've all harassed and attacked the honorable forum members here repeatedly, including myself, and create a risk for all of us. My life doesn't need to be in jeopardy just because those you listed can't control their anger. I call upon the mods to ban all of them.
Agreed. I call upon the mods to accept Gadnepumpkin or whatever the name is, accept his call. Ban the lot. Ban ceeboo first, then the lot. But first ban ceeboo and then anyone with an ass in their little picture.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
Can we get rid of the socks around this place? We've only got one of each kind, not even pairs. How about the AI issue? I thought Shades ruled against using AI except in AI dedicated threads. Did I misunderstand?
Wtheck is going on in this place?
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
Can we get rid of the socks around this place? We've only got one of each kind, not even pairs. How about the AI issue? I thought Shades ruled against using AI except in AI dedicated threads. Did I misunderstand?
Wtheck is going on in this place?
Oh no, Jersey Girl, the socks don’t match. Tragic. Someone call Fashion Police. As for AI, don’t worry — it’s only dangerous when it types better than the people crying about it.
What’s going on? Same thing as always: people whining about rules they don’t understand and socks they don’t own. Thanks for the update, though. Real crisis averted.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
You’ve set off my nonsense detector and choosing to respond. Kimmel did not lie. You and the MAGA right are acting in utter bad faith. The truth: before Charlie Kirk’s blood had cooled on the ground, MAGA opinion leaders and politicians did exactly as Kimmel described: frantically, desperately accused all kinds of people of murdering Kirk based on no evidence. They all knew that the most recent political assassination was a radicalized Trumper who impersonated a police officer and slaughtered three Democratic legislators. And he had a long hit list of democrats he planned to get to. So, what Kimmel said was absolutely true: the right was desperate to pin the murder on anything but one of them. And the government assisted in that effort by leaking the false claim that the bullet etchings symbolized “trans ideology.”
Kimmel did not say what you are pretending he said. He did not say that the murderer was MAGA. That’s a lie and a malicious one.
This is use of the government power to punish speech. Show me any example from the past where the FCC threatened local stations or a network with retaliation if they didn’t fire someone for their speech. It’s, as we say, arbitrary and capricious.
The head of the FCC threatened a corporation that is planning a merger with fines and regulatory action based on a “distortion of news.” News?? Jimmy Kimmel doing a stand up routine??? Trump had already targeted Kimmel for firing, and has even identified his next two targets. This was the government using its power to punish speech because Trump has a thin skin and can’t tolerate being the subject of a joke.
Watching self-described conservatives defend government suppression of political speech will never fail to blow my mind.
Hey Res,
Gald to see you back posting.
Kimmel lied.
Quote me the lie.
he/him
“I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time so that my children can live in peace.” — Thomas Paine
