Assualt weapons

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Lemmie »

maklelan wrote:
Kevin Graham wrote:Mak, a sexist? :lol: That's a strange definition of sexism.


Well, you've seen all my horrific sexism all over Facebook and Twitter, not to mention the racism and homophobia.

Now you sound like Peterson.

So you elevate your sexism to horrific, and throw in unrelated racism and homophobia, of which you have not been accused. A la Peterson, you can then cry 'poor pitiful me, accused and victimized.'

Last step, move on, learning nothing. Repeat.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _RockSlider »

maklelan wrote:You don't realize you're proving my point by highlighting your arousal at seeing your wife holding a gun?


Just poking fun at you Mak. I'm an old male chauvinist pig. I'll let up on ya now on this, as I have no room to talk
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Wow, Kevin, you have issues!


Care to elaborate? I assume you're not referring to the varicose veins in my feet.

Or were you just jumping on the bandwagon of meaningless support for those who can't handle having their claims refuted?
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Just curious Lemmie, how do you define sexism? You guys are probably not on the same page there.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Lemmie »

Kevin Graham wrote:Just curious Lemmie, how do you define sexism? You guys are probably not on the same page there.

Page 6, first post.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Yes, I read that but you just listed some examples that you considered sexist, but you didn't really define what sexism is. That's why I'm asking. I'm no expert on the term, but the dictionary defines it three ways, and I think the third way is probably how you intended it:

1.attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of gender roles.

2.discrimination or devaluation based on a person's sex or gender, as in restricted job opportunities, especially such discrimination directed against women.

3.ingrained and institutionalized prejudice against or hatred of women; misogyny.


Sorry, I just don't see Mak being guilt of any of this. He provided evidence to support his claim. Would I be considered a racist for saying black people are more likely to get sickle cell anemia, even after I provide scientific evidence that this is so? Or that white people are more likely to die of skin cancer? Or that black people are more athletic? Because I've actually been called a racist for saying that, believe it or not.
Last edited by YahooSeeker [Bot] on Sun Dec 06, 2015 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _RockSlider »

Kevin Graham wrote:Care to elaborate? I assume you're not referring to the varicose veins in my feet.


Several years ago when I started posting here, I took you to be an intellectual who, among the few had a very good grasp on Book of Abraham issues. It seemed you argued from a position of knowledge on these issues. I took it you were a burr under the saddle of the defenders, knowing part of this was you're aggressive style but assuming the real sting came from your expert knowledge and presentation of it.

I personally never understood all the issues here, and never followed along very closely.

It's kind of a shame, assuming there was any reality to my above observations, to see you resort to such childish taunting spam/troll material now days.

What happened to the old Kevin, or did that person ever really exist out side of my mind?
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Kevin Graham »

RockSlider wrote: I really liked it when you posted things I agreed with, but now I'm pissed off that you're using that same intellect and critical thinking skills to refute everything I believed to be true about guns! I'm upset damn it. I can't respond to the several refutations so I'm just going to pull a Ceeboo maneuver and tell you how much I don't like you.


Seriously, I don't know what I have done that could possible be considered "spam or trollish." The gif was just humor, and I'm hardly the only one who has been posting them the past couple of days.

You made some claims that were easily refuted, and I did so. Instead of just owning up to that fact and saying "OK, my bad, I was wrong," you have to pull a Ceeboo and go off on a rant about how you don't like me any more? This is third grade stuff, seriously.

I'm sorry that not all of us can be all roses and pie like Jersey Girl, Ceeboo and Tator; low on substance but high on judging others.

And if you think Mak and I agree with everything and support each other at all costs, then think again. He and I have locked horns in the past over quite a few issues. But I asked him to comment on this thread because he knows more about this subject that anyone I've ever known.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _RockSlider »

delete
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Assualt weapons

Post by _Ceeboo »

Kevin Graham wrote:you have to pull a Ceeboo and go off on a rant about how you don't like me any more? This is third grade stuff, seriously.



Image
Post Reply