Chap wrote:My view is that (amongst other things) it would be a good thing if a minority of men would take account of the strong wish most women have not to be groped against their will, spoken to or about in relation to their gender in a manner they find degrading, or to have sexual favours demanded of them as the price for their job security or career advancement not being negatively affected. And that as a result that minority of men would stop doing stuff like that.
Do you disagree with that view?
Well, my view is it would be a good thing if whatever percentage of women would take into account their own complicity within the sexual dynamic at a workplace, stop knowingly getting themselves into unprofessional relationships, and then be held accountable for their poor decision making without getting off scot free or destroying a man's career because she's not getting the benefit out of said relationship anymore.
The idea that a man's world can be destroyed simply because of an accusation is totally ridiculous. We just don't know how much quid pro quo, consent, flirting, participation, and pursuit was done by the women in these scenarios. To believe one party over the other just because one party says so is so mind blowingly dumb I don't know where to begin.
But then again, this isn't really about justice is it?
- Doc
