Kavanaugh and Perjury

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Who would give her money? That's an odd claim to make. Also, whatever you do don't check out her professor ratings from students.

As far as him perjuring himself perhaps that should be the angle the Democrats are taking? You know, a legitimate and genuine breach of professional conduct is actually something that can be fact checked and discussed as part of the nomination process vice whatever this 35-year-old claim she said/he denied fart fest is. But, then again, one does get much, much, much more political mileage out of calling Kavanaugh a rapist instead of a perjurer.

- Doc

[_Gunnar]

Do you mean these ratings? Christine Blasey Ford has become the target of a social media disinformation campaign after accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault

The truth: The negative reviews that have gotten media attention in recent days were referencing Christine A. Ford, a professor at California State University, Fullerton in Southern California — not Brett Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. She teaches at Palo Alto University in Northern California.

[Guest]

Kind of. The ratings I'm talking about took place before she came out with her allegation. I haven't checked in a few days, so I have no idea if the ones I'm thinking of have been scrubbed from Rate My Professors.

Let me know if you notice anything odd here:

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRat ... id=2403544

- Doc

[Guest]

But, then again, one does get much, much, much more political mileage out of calling Kavanaugh a rapist instead of a perjurer.

- Doc

Only because so many politicians (especially Trump's friends and supporters) are vulnerable to charges of perjury themselves. I will concede that this is not necessarily true only of GOP politicians.

[Guest]

deleted dup

[_Gunnar]

Kind of. The ratings I'm talking about took place before she came out with her allegation. I haven't checked in a few days, so I have no idea if the ones I'm thinking of have been scrubbed from Rate My Professors.

Let me know if you notice anything odd here:

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRat ... id=2403544

- Doc

Nope! That one gives her a a 4.0 rating. So what? Even if it didn't, what does her rating by her students have to do materially with her credibility? And why are you grasping at any straw you can find to impugn her credibility and reputation?

[Guest]

Kind of. The ratings I'm talking about took place before she came out with her allegation. I haven't checked in a few days, so I have no idea if the ones I'm thinking of have been scrubbed from Rate My Professors.

Let me know if you notice anything odd here:

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRat ... id=2403544

- Doc

Nope! That one gives her a a 4.0 rating. So what? Even if it didn't, what does her rating by her students have to do materially with her credibility? And why are you grasping at any straw you can find to impugn her credibility and reputation?

That's weird. She's been a professor at Stanford for how long and she has one review? When was that review dated?

And why do you believe her and not Kavanaugh? Kavanaugh flat out denied it. So did Judge. Why aren't they credible enougn to believe?

by the way, you should check out the new story from the New Yorker. You'll be really fired up after tonight.

Here's the link in case you need it:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... ah-ramirez

- Doc

[Guest]

That's weird. She's been a professor at Stanford for how long and she has one review? When was that review dated?

More straw grasping!

And why do you believe her and not Kavanaugh? Kavanaugh flat out denied it. So did Judge. Why aren't they credible enougn to believe?

I think that question has already been frequently addressed.

by the way, you should check out the new story from the New Yorker. You'll be really fired after tonight.

- Doc

Ok, I checked it out, and the story certainly doesn't help Kavanaugh's case any!

[_Gunnar]

deleted

[_Kevin Graham]

You referenced a woman who said it happened, and you called it a "lie" five times based on no evidence other than she's a woman. Women lie, not men. This is clearly how you think.

This is literally what I'm talking about. *shrugs*

- Doc

You called her claim a lie five times whereas the article does not. That's your claim based on what you believe. So.... why do you believe she's lying?

And this isn't the only person coming forward. As was the case with Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and Donald Trump, more women are deciding to come forward. All liars of course, because, you know, accused male sexual offenders deserve the benefit of the doubt over their purported victims.

So we have Cristina King Miranda who you keep saying is a liar based on zero evidence. Then we have Deborah Ramirez saying Kavanaugh exposed himself up close to her face and caused her to touch his penis without her consent. And now we have another person being represented by Michael Avenatti.

Michael Avenatti said he has 'significant evidence' that Brett Kavanaugh participated in sexual misconduct in high school

In an email to Mike Davis, the chief counsel for nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee, Avenatti said he had evidence that at house parties in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh, his friend Mark Judge, and others plied women with alcohol and drugs "in order to allow a 'train' of men to subsequently gang rape them."

Avenatti did not identify any witnesses or disclose more details about the alleged incidents. He tweeted a screenshot of the email Sunday evening after announcing he represented a woman with "credible information" about Kavanaugh and Judge.

Avenatti elaborated to Politico later on Sunday that he represents a group of people, including one victim and multiple witnesses, who can corroborate allegations involving Kavanaugh and Judge.

Holy damned crap. How long do you think it will take for the GOP to wipe all this egg off of their faces if Avenatti manages to produce significant evidence that Kavanaugh and Judge were guilty of the kind of behavior described by their accusers? All these damned GOP women going on TV talking about how this is something all boys do, it isn't a big deal, and the idiots dumb enough to believe that you can disprove any wrongdoing by getting close friends of the accused to say positive things about him.

Thus far Kavanaugh has been shown to be a liar and thus far Avenatti has lived up to everything he's promised to produce with respect to Stormy Daniels. So I see no reason to doubt him or any of the women he's representing.

So why do you?