B23 wrote:Pick one. Political Science 101:
Left: Communism/Socialism ---------------Center ---------------------Fascism : Right
Leftist historical revisionism is not "Political Science 101".....
This is the actual spectrum of Political Science 101:
Left: Facism/Communism/Socialism -------------Center---------------Freedom/Anarchy : Right.
Facism is the extreme result of LEFTIST ideology, not ideology of the Right.
The extreme of Right ideology is Anarchy, not Facism. Read the book "Liberal Facism" and get introduced to a primer on what the actual history and ideology's are and how liberalism has revised said history.
Proof to the par, name a single Facist Conservative?
Hitler was a nationalist socialist and ultimately a Facist, not a conservative.
Musolini was a communist and ultimately a Facist, not a conservative.
North Korea, communists and ultimately Facists, not conservative.
Cuba, communists and ultimately Facists, not conservative.
Venesuela, socialists and ultimately Facists, not conservative.
On and on and on.... Every communist/socialist revolution and leader either remained such or became facists. That I can think of off hand, there isn't a single conservative that ultimately became a facist. And if there is one, then they were more liberal than conservative. It's like liberals trying to make Hitler conservative just because he had christian tendacy's, used/forced corporations to do stuff, or killed some other socialists. Liberals eat their own, and everything about him otherwise was communist/socialist/facist. Take Obama, supposudly a Christian, yet willingly attack liberals when it suits them. He uses corporations, etc. Yet, everything about him is communist/socialist/facist. Simply because someone has "some" conservative aspects, usually a perversion thereof, doesn't somehow make the the "right". For example, Obama's liberal/social justice Christianity is not TRUE Christian Ideology, it is a perversion. Obama's use of Corporation is a perversion of Conservative principles based on capitalism, freedom, etc.
Anyway, read the book and learn something, rather than your liberal propaganda.
I almost guarantee you meant FDR for the New Deal. Wilson was a racist and certainly a proponent of American exceptionalism.
FDR was bad in some ways, but okay in others. His New Deal for example is not what exists today, it's went way beyond it's intent.
No, I meant Wilson.... Wilson was a nightmare leftist. Obama says similar lingo of American Exceptionalism, yet he doesn't believe a word of it, and his fruits are otherwise. Anyway, if you are trying to claim Wilson a conservative, simply because he has mimicked some conservative ideas, read the book and learn something.
We recognize that birthers are incapable of giving Obama any credit while we can at least recognize Obama's short falls. I thought the health care bill was very weak and the debate far too drawn out. Obama (until recently) seemed to have real trouble with putting forth concise messages about his policy, letting the narrative be framed by conservative media. See I can criticize him. Can you give him any credit?
Boring.... Conservatives give Obama credit when it is due, and we bashed Bush when it was due. The problem is not his "message" delivery, the problem is his ideology and fruits. "We" are not the problem, him and his administration is. Sure, I can give him credit. Great, he killed some bad guys and didn't close Gitmo. Everything else nearly has been "bad".
Reality. Obama was dealt a terrible hand by the Bush administration. Two wars, Medicare Part D and the Bush tax cuts (which created minimal jobs) led to most of our government's long term debt, plus a financial meltdown. That can't be fixed in a week. This will take years to recover from, since it took decades to come to a head and all our bubbles to pop. Today, Obama has been great for business, the stock market is way up. The economy is slowly coming back to life. He's finally righting our foreign policy and he (by directing our excellent military) killed the guy who planned 9/11, the defining moment of the past what, thirty years? He oversaw the killing of America's biggest boogie man since the Russians. Obama is a centrist. IF he was white he'd be somewhere around Reagan (well Reagan raised taxes). Racism is a key issue to birtherism, coupled with nativist elitism that anyone who is white can't be President. Hopefully I'll live to see a Hispanic or Asian President so I can see this play out again.
The actual "reality" is that the economic issues were caused by liberals "congress" and made much much worse by Obama. Liberals implimented the policy's which created the mortgage collapse, and prevent Bush, McCain and other conservatives from fixing the problems they saw. Bush may have been President, but he didn't have control of the laws. Congress makes the policy's, not the President in case you didn't know. Have you seen the Youtube videos on this issue, one for example of Barney Frank saying there is "nothing wrong with Fanny and Freddy"???
And you are so clueless..... You like all leftists can't comprehend the difference from his rhetoric with the actions of his administration and the other leftists in power. People who own businesses, own homes, etc. etc. all know exactly what OBAMA has done, not Bush, not conservatives, etc. etc. Policy's which came into effect AFTER BUSH. Obama is NOTHING CLOSE to "Reagan"..... haa haa, funnyiest thing I've heard. Reagon did raise CERTAIN taxes, but he SIGNIFICANTLY MORE lowered all taxes put together. Thus, Reagan lowered taxes. This is simply normal business practice..... You raise things in certain areas as necessary, and you lower things in other, and with the purpose of lowering OVERALL costs. Thus, when liberals say Reagon raised taxes, it's a misrepresentation of his actions. He lowered well over twice of what he raised, thus, that means he lowered taxes.
Let me give you just one example of Obama not being "great for business". Do you know why there are so many forclosed homes? While there are many reasons, one in particular was a direct result of Obama policy's. You know the bank bailouts? Well, they put a rule in there that anyone that owened a home, it had to be your primary residence, and you had to own it for at least a year, otherwise you couldn't sell it. People wanting to buy your home, couldn't get loans for the home to buy it. In other words, Obama implimented a policy when caused MANY to loose their homes, both their primary residences and their investment properties. There are many many more examples like this in private and the business sector. You don't know a darn thing you are talking about.
I would like to see Herman Cain or Alex Jones as President...... Though, my ideal duo would likely be Romney Pres and Alex Jones VP. Although, I'm liking Santorum seeing him in the Presidential debate the other day, so I might have to revise my choices.
Our views have NOTHING to do with "race"..... You are a fool!
You calling our views as being "racism" only shows your own ignorance and racism.
Your first draft of this post was written in crayon. I have photos.
Typical liberals, think and judge things like children do..... instead of considering the full facts and truths of things.