Black Racist CBS Contributor Flaunts Her Protected Status

[_Ceeboo]

This country is going to be so much better off once this white, old fart generation dies off.

Hey Kevin,

You really should have just stayed with the KEP stuff.

Really!

Peace,
Ceeboo

[_ajax18]

This country is going to be so much better off once this white, old fart generation dies off.

I'm younger than you Kevin, and I'm still reproducing those white babies you hate.

[_beastie]

This country is going to be so much better off once this white, old fart generation dies off.

I'm younger than you Kevin, and I'm still reproducing those white babies you hate.

Do you hate brown babies?

[_Droopy]

NOTHING in the rest of the conversation followed up on that point. It was OBVIOUSLY not the topic. Yes, she made an offensive joke/statement.

Both Giles and Melissa were clearly making statements of personal belief/values (and in particular Melissa's eugenics comment, which was given in complete seriousness as a logically relevant point regarding something related to Gile's comment about "building up the race." "Maybe," Giles says, followed by an interested and animated Melissa who comes right back with "Well, there is always eugenics associated with this question." Notice Melissa's completely serious demeanor, facial expression, and the tone of her voice. She was being totally serious here, without question.

Fast and furious spin, Beatie - exactly what you're known for and what generations of leftists like you have had to do when caught just being who they really are and saying what they really think.

YOUR point in your OP was that she got away with this horrific travesty because she's one of the "protected class". That is utter garbage.

Actually, black Americans are an officially protected class for the purposes of AA programs/preferences and other institutional race-based preferences mediated by government. They, as with other selected minorities, have also long been the left's mascots; helpless, hapless little children that, without the enlightened, benevolent guidance and ministrations of the Anointed, would soon fall prey to and be devoured by the relentless, pervasive, abyssal evil that is America and its core values.

I know the ideology and psychology well.

Your side is screaming outrage, just like my side screamed outrage when Bill Bennet said you could reduce crime by aborting all black babies.

Unlike Melissa and Giles, however, Bennett was not actually advocating a position, but making a hypothetical argument within a broader argument about the morality of abortion. You're still in check, Beastie.

So she hasn't gotten away with it, and she certainly isn't part of a protected class.

Blacks are an official protected class

http://www.mtu.edu/affirmative-programs ... ed-groups/

In an unofficial, ideological sense, they are for progressives yet another lumpen mass of uniform automatons - balkenized, tribalized, and alienated from their common intellectual and national patrimony - used by the Left to further its interests (power and control).

I'm not interested in debating her actual statement, and yes, I am well aware of the history of the connection of eugenics to abortion.

I'm much more interested in the connection between the eugenics movement and progressivism.

[_Bob Loblaw]

Interesting. I've been using that term in that way for many years, and nobody online anywhere has ever caught it. I've never actually looked up the definition but always assumed, given the context of its usage, that it meant "in the womb."

Thanks for pointing that out.

Glass, womb, it's all part of the rich tapestry of the English language that Droopy has mastered.

[_Droopy]

Interesting. I've been using that term in that way for many years, and nobody online anywhere has ever caught it. I've never actually looked up the definition but always assumed, given the context of its usage, that it meant "in the womb."

Thanks for pointing that out.

Glass, womb, it's all part of the rich tapestry of the English language that Droopy has mastered.

Its amazing the various and creative uses to which an arc welder can be put.

Would you like me to give you a few hints, Bob?

[_Droopy]

I do find it interesting that, for years, I've been using the term "in vitro" for "in vivo," "in the living." Quasimodo is the first of anyone online for a decade to have caught it, which is why I thanked him. I have no medical education, and have always just inferred its meaning from context, not from a lexical check.

That modo's reading comprehension levels well exceed the average 6th to 7th grade levels in this forum is to his credit.

[_Bob Loblaw]

Its amazing the various and creative uses to which an arc welder can be put.

Would you like me to give you a few hints, Bob?

This from a fellow who dares me to come up with a substantive topic for intellectual discussion and then runs away when I call his bluff.

Face it. You're a hack, and you know it.

[_Bob Loblaw]

I do find it interesting that, for years, I've been using the term "in vitro" for "in vivo," "in the living." Quasimodo is the first of anyone online for a decade to have caught it, which is why I thanked him. I have no medical education, and have always just inferred its meaning from context, not from a lexical check.

That modo's reading comprehension levels well exceed the average 6th to 7th grade levels in this forum is to his credit.

Usually you blow a gasket when someone corrects your regular malapropisms, but here we're told we're idiots because we thought it was funny enough to ignore.

"Vitro" = Latin for "glass." My seventh-grader knows that, yet you try to make it seem like we're the idiots because you didn't know that.

[_Droopy]

Its amazing the various and creative uses to which an arc welder can be put.

Would you like me to give you a few hints, Bob?

This from a fellow who dares me to come up with a substantive topic for intellectual discussion and then runs away when I call his bluff.

Face it. You're a hack, and you know it.

You know, Bob (or Buffalo, or Kishkumen, or whoever you actually are), your relentless hatred, bigotry, animosity, and desire for personal conflict almost eclipses anyone else I've ever encountered on the Web. Its really quite astonishing.

As to the challenge, although I'm somewhat familiar with Saussure and his theory of semiotics, I've never bothered with Jacques Lacan (although I've read a French philosophy anthology that covered him). Therefore, as you decided to choose a rather obscure, niche academic subject of consideration, I'd have to do some further homework, analyze and critique the concepts presented, the comparison and contrast between them, and come up with a personal perspective. That could take some time.

If you really think this rather rarefied issue is important, we could have a discussion of it in the celestial (I'm not willing to do it in any other room, if you really intend to be serious).