ajax18 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2026 11:39 pm
Has Hegseth run the numbers yet on how many American lives that’s worth?
Since you and other Democrats were among those claiming that Trump was responsible for all the COVID deaths in the US, let's add up how much the scamdemic hyperagressive lockdown response really cost the world economy.
Oh. OK.
How many trillions did Biden spend on socialism, disguised as stimulus, that led to 9% inflation, which was lower than most countries around the world. How much did all these lockdowns really cost us?
Wait. You said that you were going to add up the figures, and now you want
me to guess numbers? How about $37.96?
99.96% of people under 70 years of age with no comorbidities survived COVID. How many who got infected with COVID are now permanently disabled because of it?
‘With no comorbidities’. Right. You mean things like cardiovascular disease, Type 1 or 2 diabetes, chronic lung diseases (COPD, asthma, etc.), chronic kidney disease, cancer, obesity, compromised immune states, liver disease, and cerebrovascular disease. In other words, probably every third person in your neighborhood. I’m sure that you knew well beforehand the medical risk factors of everyone that you came into contact with.
Yes, wearing a mask sucked. Was it worth not handing off COVID to someone who could have adversely suffered or died from it? Absolutely. But YMMV; this was obviously a severe hardship for you.
Social distancing and work-from-home policies also sucked. As did homeschooling. We did it too. Somehow, we survived. Not everyone else did. At the time, though, it wasn’t so possible to put a price tag on life. Not that doing so was a hard task for the folks who whined hardest about abortions, but suddenly bitched about how random strangers dropping dead was so much more preferable than wearing a mask.
How many trillions did Biden spend on socialism, disguised as stimulus, that led to 9% inflation, which was lower than most countries around the world?
You seem to be forgetting that most of that stimulus was handed out during the Trump Administration. And thanks for admitting that our inflation rate was lower here than most countries around the world. Our recovery was faster, too.
And for what? So that 0.04% of the decrepit people might live a year or two longer?
I’ll bet that not a lot of folks die each year from tornadoes. You haven’t, yet. I’ll bet that if you found yourself in town and a tornado warning sounded, you wouldn’t heckle the people who were taking cover. You’d have joined them.
What was really odd was watching it turn out that the same folks who were yelling about how COVID was a Chinese plot to kill Americans were also the same people who refused to mask up in public. It was almost as if they were on Xi’s payroll.
What if the father decides that he doesn’t want to be a dad? Can the kids get food then?
80% of divorces are initiated by women.
You might as well blurt out the percentage of men who are the perpetrators in abusive relationships.
1. What does your figure above have to do with unmarried couples?
2. How does your figure above relate to the number of women and children on welfare?
More often than not men are kicked out of their home and not permitted to have a relationship with their children. The only thing these kids ever know about their real father is told to them through the twisted lies of a bitter mother. Because if you've already got a legal hold on 75% of what a man has and 75% of what he'll ever make, why not kick him out because he played basketball when you felt alone and needed attention? Why not bring home a new dad for your kids every couple of months? And why not have kids with whatever low life thug passes your way because the more babies you have, the more your welfare check increases. You're not really married to any of these men anyway. You're married to the government!
Who are these judges granting divorces to couples because the man ‘played basketball’? Who are these women who want to work and provide childcare to several children exclusively on their own time because of this? How much jewelry, shoes and
bonbons are these single moms buying with the extra $130 a month that they’re getting for pushing out a third or fourth child? And do any of these people know what Trump’s plan is for his seat-of-his-Depends war folly? If they do, I’ll kick in an extra box of bonbons.
Were there no broken marriages before 1960? Did men or women not abandon their children in the past?
Why do we park in driveways and drive on parkways? Why does paper rip easier when wet? Why has the fellow you voted for had at least three wives while openly admitting to cheating on all three, financing at least one abortion, and burying one of his exes in a weedy back corner of one of his crappier golf courses in order to gain a property tax break? So many questions.
And yet people survived for thousands of years without any form of taxpayer funded social welfare.
Hospitals, too. Look how long we made it before we started to build hospitals. Of course, we used to use leeches and radioactive concoctions to ‘cure’ people, but
dammit, man, we used to be
just fine without hospitals. Look how far we’ve fallen.
And starvation … that just builds character. You don’t even need to worry about starving children; if you give them a long enough amount of time, they’ll eat their unemployed parents while they’re sleeping, which will conveniently fatten them up for working in the mines while ridding ourselves of their ne’er-do-well ‘poor’ parents.
They might have had to actually ask for help.
Yes! And then you can, at that very moment, remind them of what useless sacks of fetid flesh that they are, and that how dare they ask you for help when they can just pull themselves up by their bootstraps (except that one guy with the gangrenous infected leg; he’s down to
one bootstrap). I’m certain that these useless slugs of society - the single moms, especially - deserve nothing, given that they didn’t marry the very next man who demanded it, or magically force the other man who abandoned them to do so.
They didn't get the luxury of just siphoning off tens of millions of dollars from a faceless taxpayer that they would never actually meet in person the way Somali immigrants in Minnesota do now.
Yes! So many of these immigrants are millionaires! And it’s only the immigrants! And women immigrants! All immigrants are fraudsters, which is why we need to get rid of every single one of them, because if we don’t, then they might end up competing with the professional US-citizens-and-not-Somali fraudsters, like the group of over 300 folks in Texas who were in court last year for committing $14.6 billion in fraudulent healthcare system transactions.
You see the unseen hand of freemarket private charities done on a personal level is very good at cutting out fraud.
Tammy Faye Baker is giggling somewhere, right now.
And contrary to popular opinion, most human beings are very generous to those who are truly in need of charity and have no way of doing for themselves. For a democratic socialist politician, the vote is won as soon as the money is spent, often times before a tax has even been raised to actually pay for it as is the case with deficit spending. Whether that money goes to fraud or actually helping the sick/afflicted or downtrodden is of no concern to the socialist politician because efficiency is irrelevant when it comes to purchasing votes as a part of your campaign platform.
You voted for a man who is forbidden in some states to run a charity because he skimmed off of his own, is stealing your tax dollars to run crypto scams, has used our military to take control of foreign oil that sells to the highest bidder with the money going into a Qatari bank account that only
he controls, and who sues federal agencies for $billions$ to be placed into his own accounts to assuage his random petty grievances, just for starters. You seem to be an absolutely terrible judge of both politicians and charities.
Now, how about telling us what Trump is bumbling about in Iran for?
