Water Dog wrote:Prediction. The investigation will not turn up a shred of evidence of Trump campaign colluding with Russia, or Russia "hacking" the election. Wanna put some money on it? How's a grand?
There's already evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia up to and including a written record of the Trump campaign attempting to collude with Russia and later lying about it. The current defense of that is that nothing came of that attempt. Do you not know what the word "evidence" means? I suspect it has a different, alternative meaning in your worldview, like "deficit" did on another thread. It probably means something like "proof to my satisfaction." Otherwise, I'll take my thousand dollars right now. Thanks.
(The publicly available evidence that Russia hacked the DNC/Podesta and released emails to manipulate media cycles using wikileaks to launder them is overwhelming and easily shared. It's also the conclusion of every relevant US intelligence body. That's "hacking the election." Again, I'll glady set up a paypal to collect my 1k right now if you aren't a lying liar who lies.)
Water Dog wrote:On the flip side, given uranium one and other deals ...
I love it whenever Uranium One is mentioned. I usually ask the person mentioning it to explain exactly what Hillary Clinton did, and how, and what evidence seems to prove the allegations. At that point, they usually begin to stammer, then slowly babble something incoherent, and try to change the subject to a different Clinton conspiracy theory.
Conversations with these folks can be a blast. : )
Last edited by Guest on Sat Dec 02, 2017 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Flynn and other members of the Trump have dealings with Russia on a sustained basis prior to this incident. Trump had been groomed by Russia before beginning his election bid. Trump surrounded himself with shady characters who would do whatever they deemed expedient for power and monetary gain.
Water Dog wrote:I know, right? A president elect telling his national security director to do his job
Think about what you say man. If it was just his job then why on earth would he lie to the FBI?
Because that was his job. Do try to remember who he was working for.
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Water Dog wrote:I have no idea whether Hillary Clinton did anything there that rises to the level of criminal prosecution.
Good to know. And I have no idea whether you did anything there that rises to the level of criminal prosecution. And?
Water Dog wrote:But, where there's smoke there tends to be fire,
You mean ... large numbers of Republicans have their hair on fire about their failure to find any legal grounds that might implicate the Clintons? That kind of smoke?
Water Dog wrote:...and there's a lot more smoke coming out of the DNC than the GOP, particularly as Russians are concerned.
... my clicking finger is getting tired. Your views are getting too silly to be even amusing.
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.