Migration is a Human Right

[_Doctor Steuss]

I went spelunking to see what I could find on Viking height (for what it's worth, the consensus appears to be that men averaged 5’7”-ish, and women 5’2”-ish), and found this gem.

According to Lise Lock Harvig (from the Department of Forensic Anthropology at the University of Copenhagen), it can be difficult determining gender of skeletons from the Viking era because men’s skulls were more feminine and women’s skulls were more masculine than what is generally seen today.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

The English said they were tall as trees when the Vikings first raided. Perhaps it was by comparison and everyone was shorter at the time. But I still think the Vikings were significantly taller than the Romans and other southern European people. Modern people couldn't fit in the seats of the colliseum. They were tiny.

They were viewed as unintelligent because they didn't have a written language. It makes what they were smart enough to accomplish in ship building and ocean navigation even more impressive to me.

You could've just said that you don't fact check anything you post.

by the way, my heritage falls along the Danish bloodlines. But we'll see. I'm having a genetic test done by Ancestry.com because I'm curious like that.

- Doc

[_Themis]

When did I say superior? I said I find blue eyes beautiful. It's a shame they'll be very rare and possibly gone in the near future.

You have said more then enough here and at stormfront to inform us of how you think. They won't disappear, but the future will probably have us changing our DNA.

That being said, I do suspect the Vikings were taller, stronger, and smarter than most people today. It's kind of funny that they evolved to be more beautiful as well when I doubt they cared much themselves. We their mixed descendants are likely a swarthy inferior family of a once great race of people.

This is just your white supremacist thinking, and it's wrong as others have posted. We are taller today then they were, but perhaps they were smarter then you.

[_Maxine Waters]

According to Lise Lock Harvig (from the Department of Forensic Anthropology at the University of Copenhagen), it can be difficult determining gender of skeletons from the Viking era because men’s skulls were more feminine and women’s skulls were more masculine than what is generally seen today.

I remember reading that. How are male and female skulls different exactly?

[_Maksutov]

You could've just said that you don't fact check anything you post.

No need.

[_Maxine Waters]

by the way, my heritage falls along the Danish bloodlines. But we'll see. I'm having a genetic test done by Ancestry.com because I'm curious like that.

- Doc

I think you're soft. Odin will never let you into Valhalla.

[_Gunnar]

Geneticists estimate that the last blue eyed baby will be born in 30 generations.

Even if that were true (which there is good reason to doubt, considering that it came from you), so what? How would fewer blue-eyed people make the world either better or worse?

So you will be rid of cheeto haired people, but not as soon as you'd like. That's some real diversity isn't it?

Other than the cheeto haired fool who now inhabits the White House, why would Maksutov or anyone else want to get rid "cheeto haired people"? Do you really buy into the egregious idiocy that there is any serious advocacy for initiating white genocide afoot?

[_Maxine Waters]

Even if that were true (which there is good reason to doubt, considering that it came from you), so what? How would fewer blue-eyed people make the world either better or worse?

You're definitely not going to Valhalla. Your ancestors are indeed disappointed with how soft you've become.

[_Analytics]

Geneticists estimate that the last blue eyed baby will be born in 30 generations.

No they don't. None of them do. Anybody who understands what Mendel figured out about dominant and recessive genes knows that as long as people with at least one blue-eyed gene continue to have babies, blue-eyed genes will continue to be around. And if blue-eyed genes are still around, there will always be more blue-eyed babies.

Think about it. Say you have 100 people with two blue-eyed genes and 100 people with two brown-eyed genes. In total, this population would have 200 blue-eyed genes and 200 brown-eyed genes. If these people freely hooked up and had babies at a replacement rate, then after many generations, the genetic makeup would look like this:

50 people would have two blue-eyed genes.
100 would have one brown-eyed gene and one blue-eyed gene.
50 people would have two brown-eyed genes.

Thus, after freely mixing it up there are still 200 blue-eyed genes and 200 brown-eyed genes. Yes, the number of people with blue eyes decrease from 100 to 50, but it will never shrink beyond that. There is no way anybody who is rightly called a "geneticst" would not understand this.

The only basis I can think of for somebody saying that blue-eyed people will become extinct would be the claim that blue-eyed people are having kids at a below replacement rate, and thus their population will eventually shrink and disappear. So saying that the last blue-eyed baby will be born in 30 generations is like saying that in 1,000 years there will be no more Japanese or Russians, because right now, they aren't having kids at a replacement rate either.

[Reflexzero]

I remember reading that. How are male and female skulls different exactly?

According to this entry I found on a forensic site, these are the key differences. Of course these are all "typical" differences, so there will always be exceptions (like that in Viking skulls).

Size / Weight. Men's skulls are generally larger, thicker, and heavier than female skulls.

Temporal Lines. The area of the skull where the temporal muscle attaches often has a more pronounced ridge in male skulls.

Eye Socket / Orbit. The surface of lower section of the “orbit” is typically blunter with male skulls, and sharper with female.

”Monkey Brow”. The area of the skull, known as the superciliary arch has slight ridging in male skulls, and in female skulls there is little to no ridging visible.

I took the below graphic from this blog.