Given that Fuentes leads a movement of ‘Groypers’, is a Holocaust denier and thinks that Jews and women are the cause of all of his problems, I don’t see that Schmo is similar.
One would hope that your vaunted powers of observation were somehow better than they are.
Line by line.
Schmo is not a groyper, he does however do the same thing a a groyper by following a specific movement, exmo democrat progressive. He even has a fat yellow ass character.
Schmo thinks Magates (sp) are a threat to him and the cause of his and America’s problems. Same thing, different outcome.
Thanks for having to back down on your silly claim.
And Schmo isn’t leading a group of many thousands in trying to threaten or remove other Americans, or to rewrite history.
Schmo is not a groyper, he does however do the same thing a a groyper by following a specific movement, exmo democrat progressive. He even has a fat yellow ass character.
Schmo thinks Magates (sp) are a threat to him and the cause of his and America’s problems. Same thing, different outcome.
Thanks for having to back down on your silly claim.
And Schmo isn’t leading a group of many thousands in trying to threaten or remove other Americans, or to rewrite history.
You’re welcome.
I have not backed down. I stepped up. Nobody said Schmo is a leader, LOL. And nobody said he is writing anything.
Schmo played the victim card, you played the victim card, Fuentes has, according to you, played a victim card.
What is Shmoe’s or your view on the government’s role? Seems they are the same - but with a different outcome. Right? If not, what are the differences?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
Thanks for having to back down on your silly claim.
And Schmo isn’t leading a group of many thousands in trying to threaten or remove other Americans, or to rewrite history.
You’re welcome.
I have not backed down. I stepped up. Nobody said Schmo is a leader, LOL. And nobody said he is writing anything.
Schmo played the victim card, you played the victim card, Fuentes has, according to you, played a victim card.
What is Shmoe’s or your view on the government’s role? Seems they are the same - but with a different outcome. Right? If not, what are the differences?
Nobody needed you to step in and make an ignorant observation in service to equivocation, yet there you are.
And now you’re trying to expand an already crap statement. That works for some folks in the MAGA world; not so much here or anywhere else.
I have not backed down. I stepped up. Nobody said Schmo is a leader, LOL. And nobody said he is writing anything.
Schmo played the victim card, you played the victim card, Fuentes has, according to you, played a victim card.
What is Shmoe’s or your view on the government’s role? Seems they are the same - but with a different outcome. Right? If not, what are the differences?
Nobody needed you to step in and make an ignorant observation in service to equivocation, yet there you are.
And now you’re trying to expand an already crap statement. That works for some folks in the MAGA world; not so much here or anywhere else.
What statement?
This statement? There is no daylight between you, Shmoe, Philo and Feuntes. You all share the same authoritarian views with the only difference being one of outcome? It’s not a statement of taste or righteousness.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
Nobody needed you to step in and make an ignorant observation in service to equivocation, yet there you are.
And now you’re trying to expand an already crap statement. That works for some folks in the MAGA world; not so much here or anywhere else.
What statement?
This statement? There is no daylight between you, Shmoe, Philo and Feuntes. You all share the same authoritarian views with the only difference being one of outcome? It’s not a statement of taste or righteousness.
Here’s where you stamp your feet and internally scream, “Listen to my BS!”
Sorry, Binger, but Schmo isn’t leading a group of many thousands in trying to threaten or remove other Americans, or to rewrite history.
Again, your powers of observation seem … really lacking.
This statement? There is no daylight between you, Shmoe, Philo and Feuntes. You all share the same authoritarian views with the only difference being one of outcome? It’s not a statement of taste or righteousness.
Here’s where you stamp your feet and internally scream, “Listen to my BS!”
Sorry, Binger, but Schmo isn’t leading a group of many thousands in trying to threaten or remove other Americans, or to rewrite history.
Again, your powers of observation seem … really lacking.
You are correct. Shmoe is not a leader. He is a victim. We get it. Exactly as Fuentes is allegedly a victim. That is established.
However, one need not be a leader to have an ideology. And here, Shmoe and Fuentes and you and Philo share authoritarian ideologies, though with different hoped or faithed outcomes. Right?
On the one hand, the government shall allow _____. On the other, the government shall disallow _______.
If this is not the case, and one is more libertarian than the other, I am sure you have examples.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
Here’s where you stamp your feet and internally scream, “Listen to my BS!”
Sorry, Binger, but Schmo isn’t leading a group of many thousands in trying to threaten or remove other Americans, or to rewrite history.
Again, your powers of observation seem … really lacking.
You are correct. Shmoe is not a leader. He is a victim. We get it. Exactly as Fuentes is allegedly a victim. That is established.
However, one need not be a leader to have an ideology. And here, Shmoe and Fuentes and you and Philo share authoritarian ideologies, though with different hoped or faithed outcomes. Right?
On the one hand, the government shall allow _____. On the other, the government shall disallow _______.
If this is not the case, and one is more libertarian than the other, I am sure you have examples.
There you go again, trying to insert your imagined fears and desires into the comments of others.
You are correct. Shmoe is not a leader. He is a victim. We get it. Exactly as Fuentes is allegedly a victim. That is established.
However, one need not be a leader to have an ideology. And here, Shmoe and Fuentes and you and Philo share authoritarian ideologies, though with different hoped or faithed outcomes. Right?
On the one hand, the government shall allow _____. On the other, the government shall disallow _______.
If this is not the case, and one is more libertarian than the other, I am sure you have examples.
There you go again, trying to insert your imagined fears and desires into the comments of others.
A whining flailing lying tactic is a great look on you.
I fear nothing and this requires no imagination.
You have more than exclaimed my point. There is no difference in your authoritarian views versus those of Fuentes. I don't see a difference. Same for philo and Shmoe
If you have any examples of differences, please bring them. That will be great.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
There you go again, trying to insert your imagined fears and desires into the comments of others.
A whining flailing lying tactic is a great look on you.
I fear nothing and this requires no imagination.
You have more than exclaimed my point. There is no difference in your authoritarian views versus those of Fuentes. I don't see a difference. Same for philo and Shmoe
If you have any examples of differences, please bring them. That will be great.
I think that the only whining and flailing is coming from yourself, after being called out for pretending that Schmo is anything like someone leading a political movement to threaten and harass people, deny the Holocaust, or proclaim that Jews and women are the source of America’s woes.
But it’s cool to watch you try to single out Schmo, while ignoring the magnitude of Fuentes’s words.
A whining flailing lying tactic is a great look on you.
I fear nothing and this requires no imagination.
You have more than exclaimed my point. There is no difference in your authoritarian views versus those of Fuentes. I don't see a difference. Same for philo and Shmoe
If you have any examples of differences, please bring them. That will be great.
I think that the only whining and flailing is coming from yourself, after being called out for pretending that Schmo is anything like someone leading a political movement to threaten and harass people, deny the Holocaust, or proclaim that Jews and women are the source of America’s woes.
But it’s cool to watch you try to single out Schmo, while ignoring the magnitude of Fuentes’s words.
No no no.
The outcome Shmoe and Philo want may vary from the outcome that Fuentes wants.
Though, their authoritarian ideologies and to your point, victimization, is shared almost perfectly. Can’t see a distinction there. Can you?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
