Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:12 am
Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
Not intended to be ironic, I am certain.Gunnar wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:08 amDo you honestly still fail to see that Trump is pathologically dishonest and incorrigibly corrupt and a great danger to democracy in general and American democracy in particular? Incredible! He makes Richard M. Nixon look like a choirboy in comparison! His overriding motivation is continually augmenting his own wealth and power, no matter who or how many get hurt in the process.
Yes, exactly! And never is this truer than with religion and politics, especially when the two are combined. As I have repeatedly said -- "backfire effect." Admittedly all of us are to a lessor or greater degree susceptible to this phenomenon and need to honestly and repeatedly examine and try to purge ourselves from it, but too many of us never even try.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:17 pmGreat observation. This is much like the questioning Mormon who has invested so much time and energy in the church not wanting to acknowledge it's obviously not what it says it because they'd have to suffer the emotional loss of all the investing. Plus, a lot of people just have a difficult time admitting they were wrong.Gunnar wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:51 amIf Republican officials and candidates turn on Trump and acknowledge his incompetence and/or criminality, they, in effect, have to either admit to having been fools and cowards for having supported him for so long, and/or have to admit to the appearance of having been accessories after the fact to his crimes. It is understandable they would be reluctant to do this.
yep. Too many of us never even try.Gunnar wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:41 am
Yes, exactly! And never is this truer than with religion and politics, especially when the two are combined. As I have repeatedly said -- "backfire effect." Admittedly all of us are to a lessor or greater degree susceptible to this phenomenon and need to honestly and repeatedly examine and try to purge ourselves from it, but too many of us never even try.
The defense of Richard Nixon in the Watergate Hearings was led by a Southern California Congressman named Charles Wiggins. When the tapes finally came out, Wiggins had tears in his eyes when he announced he would vote for impeachment. He was a lifelong friend and Nixon's most passionate defender, but he was ultimately swayed by the evidence.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:17 pmGreat observation. This is much like the questioning Mormon who has invested so much time and energy in the church not wanting to acknowledge it's obviously not what it says it because they'd have to suffer the emotional loss of all the investing. Plus, a lot of people just have a difficult time admitting they were wrong.Gunnar wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:51 amIf Republican officials and candidates turn on Trump and acknowledge his incompetence and/or criminality, they, in effect, have to either admit to having been fools and cowards for having supported him for so long, and/or have to admit to the appearance of having been accessories after the fact to his crimes. It is understandable they would be reluctant to do this.
I wish there were. I somehow doubt that Trump has any lifelong friends as passionately devoted to him as Charles Wiggins was to Richard Nixon, yet honest enough to see Trump for what he is.MeDotOrg wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:21 amThe defense of Richard Nixon in the Watergate Hearings was led by a Southern California Congressman named Charles Wiggins. When the tapes finally came out, Wiggins had tears in his eyes when he announced he would vote for impeachment. He was a lifelong friend and Nixon's most passionate defender, but he was ultimately swayed by the evidence.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:17 pm
Great observation. This is much like the questioning Mormon who has invested so much time and energy in the church not wanting to acknowledge it's obviously not what it says it because they'd have to suffer the emotional loss of all the investing. Plus, a lot of people just have a difficult time admitting they were wrong.
Is there a Charles Wiggins left in Congress?
January 6 defendants think they’re being treated unfairly by law enforcement. So it’s time for Trump supporters to have “The Talk” about the police. #DailyShow #Comedy
Exactly, Sherlock. That is literally how it works. There is nothing to shrug about, because that is literally, how it works.
Oh. You mean, a congressperson who can be passionate and vote based on facts and evidence?MeDotOrg wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 5:21 amThe defense of Richard Nixon in the Watergate Hearings was led by a Southern California Congressman named Charles Wiggins. When the tapes finally came out, Wiggins had tears in his eyes when he announced he would vote for impeachment. He was a lifelong friend and Nixon's most passionate defender, but he was ultimately swayed by the evidence.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:17 pm
Great observation. This is much like the questioning Mormon who has invested so much time and energy in the church not wanting to acknowledge it's obviously not what it says it because they'd have to suffer the emotional loss of all the investing. Plus, a lot of people just have a difficult time admitting they were wrong.
Is there a Charles Wiggins left in Congress?