Trump's War on the First Amendment

[Hound of Heaven]

Yes, he did threaten me twice, and I agree with those who argue that he should be suspended. If he had threatened anyone else in the same way, I would be saying the same thing. Any poster who resorts to thinly veiled threats to the livelihood of others, especially at a time when we know that a number of people are hunting out political opponents for retribution, should be suspended from the board. It is time to "lower the temperature." Sometimes a time-out is the best medicine. Markk is welcome to share his dumb opinions here freely, but when he threatens people, he has worn out his welcome for the time being.

Yup, that was a threat addressed to Kishkumen, and that was underlined by his later posts. Markk should be suspended for that in my view. Can we have a ruling from the Mods, please?

This warrants a ban in my opinion. It’s actually a breach of two important board rules. It contains in real life information and contains an in real life threat. We cannot have posters bringing threats of real life harassment to the board. I’ve reported the post and I think a public notification of what action is taken is also warranted on this occasion.

Markk violated our board rules in this thread, and I've seen nothing to indicate he won't make another threat.

When Dr. Shades asked you to stop calling MG2.0 a liar, you broke our board rules. He told you straight out that what you were doing was an insult to MG2.0 as a person, but you decided to ignore him. You're breaking the rules, so why are you whining about Markk here? Marcus, you not only lie, but you also act like a jerk by following conservatives around like a spoiled kid on the playground, trying to get them in trouble with the teacher. That you are a sad person with hate in your heart! Take a break!!

[Marcus]

Markk violated our board rules in this thread, and I've seen nothing to indicate he won't make another threat.

I say ban the Nazi fascist homophobe racist SOB.

Immediately!

Just to clarify, this is a discussion of rules 7*and 9**. Are you suggesting that violating these rules repeatedly merits a ban? (I've quoted the rules in the footnotes below for your convenience.)


-----
*7. Do not reveal personal or "in real life" information about any poster on this site that he or she has not explicitly revealed here. This includes avoiding mention of his/her actual first or last name, even if he or she has made it available on some other website. This also includes information harvested from Facebook.


**9. Do not make threats or take actions to cause another member to feel harassed or fearful for his or her safety "in real life."

[Hound of Heaven]

I say ban the Nazi fascist homophobe racist SOB.

Immediately!

Just to clarify, this is a discussion of rules 7*and 9**. Are you suggesting that violating these rules repeatedly merits a ban? (I've quoted the rules in the footnotes below for your convenience.)


-----
*7. Do not reveal personal or "in real life" information about any poster on this site that he or she has not explicitly revealed here. This includes avoiding mention of his/her actual first or last name, even if he or she has made it available on some other website. This also includes information harvested from Facebook.


**9. Do not make threats or take actions to cause another member to feel harassed or fearful for his or her safety "in real life."

Oh look, the idiot Marxist progressive who told me a few weeks ago that I was a board nanny is now one!


Marcus the Carcass, you make me laugh so hard! It's hard to find someone more hypocritical than you. If rules are so important to you, why haven't you stopped calling MG2.0 a fibber after Dr. Shades told you that was against the rules? You were rude to Dr. Shades!! And you don't respect him!

[Molok]

Nevermind, apparently I'm not the only one fond of poking fun at HOH's melodrama

[ceeboo]

I say ban the Nazi fascist homophobe racist SOB.

Immediately!

Just to clarify, this is a discussion of rules 7*and 9**. Are you suggesting that violating these rules repeatedly merits a ban?

Just to clarify regarding your clarification, I am not interested in the board rules - I have never read them.

No matter what the rules are (or are not), I think the racist fascist homophobe Trumptard should be banned forever. So should you.

[Whiskey]

Nevermind, apparently I'm not the only one fond of poking fun at HOH's melodrama

I liked the janny comment better. But, let's be honest, you should also be banned permanently for saying it.

[Molok]

Nevermind, apparently I'm not the only one fond of poking fun at HOH's melodrama

I liked the janny comment better. But, let's be honest, you should also be banned permanently for saying it.

I've always thought "board janny" was an inherently funny term, personally. And I'll gladly take the ban as long as a permanent thread is pinned to the top of every page saying what a great and noble poster I was, and how I always tried to get along with everyone, regardless of their political affiliation.

[Hound of Heaven]

I say ban the Nazi fascist homophobe racist SOB.

Immediately!

Just to clarify, this is a discussion of rules 7*and 9**. Are you suggesting that violating these rules repeatedly merits a ban? (I've quoted the rules in the footnotes below for your convenience.)


-----
*7. Do not reveal personal or "in real life" information about any poster on this site that he or she has not explicitly revealed here. This includes avoiding mention of his/her actual first or last name, even if he or she has made it available on some other website. This also includes information harvested from Facebook.


**9. Do not make threats or take actions to cause another member to feel harassed or fearful for his or her safety "in real life."

Oh look, I found a picture of queen Marcus the Carcass sitting on her throne and typing away, telling the moderators to enforce the rules on conservatives. At the same time, she's breaking the rules by insulting MG2.0 all the time, even though Dr. Shades told her not to do that more than three weeks ago!

What a board nanny!!

Hound, I don’t think you’ve made a post in the past 3 months that didn’t include multiple attempts to namecall or insult multiple people. If that’s just going to continue, then I’ll have to start booting these out of threads as these are ending up being nothing more than silly derails. -c-

[canpakes]

Just to clarify, this is a discussion of rules 7*and 9**. Are you suggesting that violating these rules repeatedly merits a ban?

Just to clarify regarding your clarification, I am not interested in the board rules - I have never read them.

No matter what the rules are (or are not), I think the racist fascist homophobe Trumptard should be banned forever. So should you.

Ceeboo, please make this request using the official DM forms. A quick tutorial on where to go to download these and to fill them out correctly can be found here:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

[Whiskey]

Just to clarify, this is a discussion of rules 7*and 9**. Are you suggesting that violating these rules repeatedly merits a ban? (I've quoted the rules in the footnotes below for your convenience.)


-----
*7. Do not reveal personal or "in real life" information about any poster on this site that he or she has not explicitly revealed here. This includes avoiding mention of his/her actual first or last name, even if he or she has made it available on some other website. This also includes information harvested from Facebook.


**9. Do not make threats or take actions to cause another member to feel harassed or fearful for his or her safety "in real life."

Oh look, I found a picture of queen Marcus the Carcass sitting on her throne and typing away, telling the moderators to enforce the rules on conservatives. At the same time, she's breaking the rules by insulting MG2.0 all the time, even though Dr. Shades told her not to do that more than three weeks ago!

What a board nanny!!

That pelvis appears to have some non-feminine features.