Kevin Graham wrote:Well they won't be able to say he wasn't at the beach party since it is plastered all over his calendar in huge writing. Guess they screwed the pooch by presenting the calendar.
Like I mentioned to Doctor Steuss I don't think that's their play. I think this puts the onus back on Accuser #1, to fix a date to the alleged assault, and then to provide details that corroborate her whereabouts and alleged witnesses. I mean, there's always a chance she can drop a bombshell during her testimony tomorrow, but that remains to be seen (probably depending on the agreed upon line of questioning). I think the problem with Accuser #3 she allegedly attended 10 of these parties where purported gang rapes, or drugging girls, or whatever took place, but who knows who purportedly did what and when.
Accuser#3's big win in this is to get a GOP Senator to break ranks and to call for an FBI investigation that could probably address questions like:
Why did she stand by while people were raped?
Proof that rape occurred at any of these parties?
Who are additional witnesses to these alleged said gang rapes.
Who are the boys that allegedly participated in gang rapes, and can criminal charges be filed?
Etc...
The FBI could probably interview the 60-whatever people who put out a letter today stating none of them ever heard of Accuser #3.
This could probably get them through November (this is one of the reasons why I mentioned earlier in the thread that an FBI investigation would most likely run into the months, which at this point I'm pretty confident would be the case).
- Doc