It is a given history that the meeting was "secret." Meaning Britain and Russia alone, no US representation. There is a lot written about it.Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Tue Jul 08, 2025 3:10 amAh, fairly noted. Mea culpa. Thanks.Markk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 08, 2025 2:31 am
when is changes the context, it does....it you believe what you did is a honest assessment of what he said in the foreword, then you won't get it. He said he took detailed notes in Moscow....The conference was in Moscow, with Russians and Stalin....
. In Moscow, however, owing to the need for translation, there was time to make detailed notes of my talks with Stalin and other Soviet officials
I don't know if the meeting was secret, but for reasons we haven't discussed I think it fairly certain that Harriman was not present for the 'percentages note' meeting. Just for what it's worth.What do you believe on the subject, was the meeting secret and between Stalin and Churchill, or do all these historians got it wrong?
The larger point I was making is that Churchill, whom I respect and he was the Lion, was very concerned for Britain. He knew Britain would never again be the World power it was before the war, and was trying to protect Britain's interests that remained, and against the Soviets if the kept going west.