Ah. Now you’re disinviting me, too. Sorry, but I can’t accommodate you.
It’s indeed amusing that your britches are wrapped up around the idea that I “perpetually antagonize(s) one or more people”, given your first 2000 posts doing just that to a dozen other folks.
But, I understand that you’ve changed now, and want to be taken seriously. That’s great. You can also survive in the midst of opinions and comments that differ from yours, I trust, without going into meltdown after meltdown.
And as for my posting history - it’s all here, all 10 years or so of it, readable by anyone who wishes … unlike yours, which has been subject to “… misrepresent(ing) your posting history and activity on this board to shield yourself and your pals”, by you. Please aspire to attain the standards that you want to impose on others.
I did not disinvite you. And your accusation here and in the previous post is unfounded. This is typical for you to make misleading statements.
Would you like to address the points I brought up, or, are you content to just make accusations and post judgments of a forum member?
I am not a moderator. You are are. We are not subject to the same standards.
Could you kindly post an example of any recent post by me that could fairly be characterised as "foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical"?
That will help me understand why you decided that the post you quote was so "Extremely well done".
Apologies for my sloppiness. I made my comment about a fairly long post that was littered with top-level fantastic content (in my opinion) and I did not intend that my comment was a reply to every word in the post.
On another note - You asked me for some examples of similar offenses from D's - which I gave you - do you have any comment on that?
When you come to a thread that covers multiple instances of child molestation by members of your party, and your only response is this...
Then yeah, that kind of idiotic deflecting serves the same purpose as a defense for the behavior. As self proclaiming Christians, I would expect everyone voting Republican to jump in this thread and immediately condemn these crimes against children. But that's not what we see here. It never is. The only time we see that kind of indignation is whenever FOX or Brietbart tells them things to be outraged about, like when a Democrat in Hollywood accidentally kills someone.
And you're lying about wanting a "normal conversation." I mean, seriously? If anything should be perfectly clear about your presence on this board it is that it is designed to provide anything but normal conversations.
Last edited by K Graham on Fri Nov 05, 2021 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal" - Ajax18
When you come to a thread that covers multiple instances of child molestation by members of your party, and your only response is this...
Then yeah, that kind of idiotic deflecting serves the same purpose as a defense for the behavior. As self proclaiming Christians, I would expect everyone voting Republican to jump in this thread and immediately condemn these crimes against children. But that's not what we see here. It never is. The only time we see that kind of indignation is whenever FOX or Brietbart tells them things to be outraged about, like when a Democrat in Hollywood accidentally kills someone.
See how this works? This is the point of the sock puppet cartoon. That was, obviously, not my only response. My response was much lengthier than that, more thoughtful than that, and my indignation for crimes against children is very high.
[...] Chap [...] have shown us all, once again, why nobody wants to ride in a car with them. Their foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical reactions are unbalanced, unmoored and unhelpful.
Thank you for bringing Cultellus' post to my attention. Its tone and content once again reassure me that having him on ignore is a rather good idea.
Could you kindly post an example of any recent post by me that could fairly be characterised as "foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical"?
That will help me understand why you decided that the post you quote was so "Extremely well done".
Apologies for my sloppiness. I made my comment about a fairly long post that was littered with top-level fantastic content (in my opinion) and I did not intend that my comment was a reply to every word in the post.
OK. So you can still say that a post is "spectacular" and so "extremely well done" as to merit a "hat tip" when it contains a vituperative and (I think you agree) quite unjustified denunciation of one poster as "foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical"?
Maybe you need to be a little less uncritical of Cultellus, don't you think?
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
[...] Chap [...] have shown us all, once again, why nobody wants to ride in a car with them. Their foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical reactions are unbalanced, unmoored and unhelpful.
Thank you for bringing Cultellus' post to my attention. Its tone and content once again reassure me that having him on ignore is a rather good idea.
Could you kindly post an example of any recent post by me that could fairly be characterised as "foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical"?
That will help me understand why you decided that the post you quote was so "Extremely well done".
Apologies for my sloppiness. I made my comment about a fairly long post that was littered with top-level fantastic content (in my opinion) and I did not intend that my comment was a reply to every word in the post.
OK. So you can still say that a post is "spectacular" and so "extremely well done" as to merit a "hat tip" when it contains a vituperative and (I think you agree) quite unjustified denunciation of one poster as "foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical"?
Maybe you need to be a little less uncritical of Cultellus, don't you think?
Maybe you need to be a little less uncritical of Cultellus, don't you think?
Ceeboo is a sheeple. He'll naïvely follow anyone who tells him things he likes to hear and smear those who don't. Doesn't matter if those things are on solid ground.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal" - Ajax18
