subgenius wrote:Hey thanks for the link, one quick question - why did your cut-n-paste dodge this?
The process of impeaching someone in the House of Representatives and the Senate is difficult, made so to be the balance against efforts to easily remove people from office for minor reasons that could easily be determined by the standard of "high crimes and misdemeanors".
(again, everything isn't as you say it is)
LOL indeed.
This is quite an attempt to save face. I point out that all presidential conduct is technically on the table because Congress retains the authority to define impeacheable offenses. You gainsay me and reference the Constitution, so I have to explain remedial American government to you. You retort with, "yeah, but it would be really hard." Nothing I said addressed the difficulty of convincing Congress to draw up outlandish articles of impeachment for minor offenses. I merely pointed out that Congress has the legal discretion to define what constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor. I did this to pivot to discussing what is intended and ought to be an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor. You gainsayed that too, again referring me to the Constitution. So I had to quote the Federalist Papers using my exact language, at which point you sheepishly ignored it and kept plugging away.