Lemmie wrote::rolleyes: you know nothing about me, cam.
You're the one who was arguing you were biased against racially, sexually and gender-wise, but then collapsed it all to this:
cam wrote:The 1%, in my opinion, have too much. The rest of us, the 90%'ers ...
Your arguments were rendered meaningless when you let that slip. Thinking too much about "the 1%" is your problem, cam, no one else's.
Easy there, Lemmie. You can put down the $30 bottles of Cabernet and drink Yellow Tail, instead. Use the savings to send a disadvantaged kid to school, Madame Bourgeoisie. Anyway. I see I'm getting exactly 0 commitments from the White Liberals here to set aside their White Privilege.
It's just shameful.
- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
cam wrote:Easy there, Lemmie. You can put down the $30 bottles of Cabernet and drink Yellow Tail, instead. Use the savings to send a disadvantaged kid to school, Madame Bourgeoisie. Anyway. I see I'm getting exactly 0 commitments from the White Liberals here to set aside their White Privilege.
It's just shameful.
- Doc
apparently imagining what the 1% do and projecting it on people you don't know is part of your problem as well. Xenophon's suggestion might help with that shame you feel.
Here is a study from The National Bureau of Economic Research modeling a process where blacks receive closer scrutiny in job performance where smaller mistakes are magnified and this discriminatory monitoring leads to lower performance evaluations and ultimately more unemployment and lower wages on average. Those facts reinforce more racially stereotyped discriminatory monitoring in a self-sustaining feedback loop:
This is definitionally an example of racial privilege.
It's receiving renewed focus in the twitterverse for reasons I don't understand. Unfortunately, no one has achieved the galaxy brain level of Doc and pointed out that because the white authors of the study haven't given up their academic careers to live a life of street paupers, it proves their findings are disingenuous.
EAllusion wrote:Here is a study from The National Bureau of Economic Research showing that blacks receive closer scrutiny in job performance where smaller mistakes are magnified and this discriminatory monitoring leads to lower performance evaluations and ultimately more unemployment and lower wages on average. Those facts reinforce more racially stereotyped discriminatory monitoring in a self-sustaining feedback loop:
This is definitionally an example of racial privilege.
It's receiving renewed focus in the twitterverse for reasons I don't understand. Unfortunately, no one has achieved the galaxy brain level of Doc and pointed out that because the white authors of the study haven't given up their academic careers to live a life of street paupers, it proves their findings are disingenuous.
I notice that you are always the only one pointing to research studies. Good job EAlllusion! It is a very interesting study.
Your arguments were rendered meaningless when you let that slip. Thinking too much about "the 1%" is your problem, cam, no one else's.
