subgenius wrote:Wasn't inadvertent, and am I not accurate?...though arguably, our "historical immigrants" persevered for a bit first before throwing in the towel.
But how did that immigration policy work out for Elizabeth Warren's ancestors?...are you going to bring some corn to the Honduran table this November?
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I'm not sure how to address what you posted above.- Doc
Understandable. I guess i was responding to your implication of irony/hypocrisy about my post where I called the caravan-eers quitters. While the inclination to draw a parallel with early American settlers and immigrants is tempting, it is not appropriate. The people coming from Honduras are nowhere similar in purpose or circumstance.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: I know when men are compelled to travel huge distances to a new land to begin a new life, they're usually in such a horrific situation they're willing to risk everything, their own lives even, to have opportunity that just doesn't exist where they live.
I am not sure how you know that, but the sentiment is certainly admirable and one I support. But risking one's life is not necessarily entitlement for success and not justification for admiration....on the field of battle two opposing soldiers may well be risking everything, but only one will be viewed as noble and as a hero.
But yes, the members of the caravan are risking varying degrees of everything...and likely for various reasons...I think border security inherently has a concern with the latter. Just simply surviving a ride across the Atlantic in the Santa Maria or the Mayflower does not entitle you to the property, does it?
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: I like those kinds of men. They're the kinds of men that built the world in which we exist today. Love 'em.
I would agree with you to a degree, so f**k Honduras....let us make America better.
