Kavanaugh and Perjury

[_EAllusion]

What has he done with the last 26-years of his life? Isn't that what Democrats should be focused on?

- Doc

Lie under oath a lot, it turns out.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... -of-bitter

Perhaps one of the reasons why he was considered for the position is this:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... -of-bitter

The 53-year-old Kavanaugh has spent the past 12 years as a federal judge on the nation’s second most powerful court — the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals — where he authored more than 300 opinions.

... the Supreme Court has adopted more than a dozen of his rulings as the law of the land.

That's a heck of a track record one might agree, no?

- Doc

[_Kevin Graham]

He was in a college bar fight? That just makes me like him, actually. Now he's relatable to half the country.

- Doc

Yep. I saw this "breaking news" last night on MSNBC and thought it was a complete nuthin burger. I mean let's focus on the lies and stop looking for irrelevant crap like this. If he were arrested or something that would be different, but to make this the story of the day... I just didn't get it.

[_canpakes]

If DogFord makes a crazy claim, and SSKavanaugh states, “zero evidence” because DogFord has given none, then SSKavanaugh is under no obligation to find the nonexistent evidence that DogFord either doesn’t want to provide or cannot locate ifbecause it is nonexistent.

FIFY

No one would ever have expected that Kavanaugh himself would provide evidence of grinding his drunken teenage form against anyone. Again, that’s not how the process works, so you might want to brush up a little on these things.

Unfortunately for Kavanaugh, he did provide - unsolicited - all of the evidence needed to determine that his whiny, angry, evasive, conspiratorial self is unfit to judge much of anything, let alone what something as simple as his juvenile yearbook BS actually means.

[_Kevin Graham]

New evidence shows that Kavanaugh was coordinating a response to the Ramirez claims before the New Yorker broke the news. Something Kavanaugh swore under oath he didn't know about.

Yep, just add it to the list.

[_canpakes]

People are livid. I see many people who were #NeverTrump are now firmly in the red. I'm seeing very blue democrats even say they are voting Republican. Because they have sons and husbands and fathers, and they aren't going to stand for this. They are smart enough to realize that if this attitude becomes the new norm in our culture, the fallout will affect them directly. They don't want their husband to be fired and have his career permanently destroyed because of fake allegations with zero evidence. They don't want their son to grow up in a world where it's somehow illegal to be a male, or a "white man," as if that's something to be ashamed of and apologize for.

This belief being a bit loony and unhinged notwithstanding, how does a vote for Trump save us from that fate?

WD, are you still hiding under the bed, or having a low T day, or something? Or can you explain this bit of hysteria?

[_Kevin Graham]

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/396224-kavanaugh-offers-lengthy-judicial-record-ahead-of-bitter

Perhaps one of the reasons why he was considered for the position is this:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... -of-bitter

The 53-year-old Kavanaugh has spent the past 12 years as a federal judge on the nation’s second most powerful court — the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals — where he authored more than 300 opinions.

... the Supreme Court has adopted more than a dozen of his rulings as the law of the land.

That's a heck of a track record one might agree, no?

- Doc

Him being qualified was never in question until now because of character.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Him being qualified was never in question until now because of character.

I think no matter who Trump nominated it was just going to be a dirty, knockdown, drag out fight.

- Doc

[_Some Schmo]

People are livid. I see many people who were #NeverTrump are now firmly in the red.

This belief being a bit loony and unhinged notwithstanding, how does a vote for Trump save us from that fate?

I remember during the 2016 primaries when it seemed everyone I knew was going to vote for Bernie. It was a good reminder that anecdotal evidence is often worthless. All it proved is that I happen to hang out with the kinds of people who liked Bernie. I have little doubt WD runs with idiot Drumpf fans.

For every "livid" person WD claims to know, I know a woman who will never vote GOP again. So what?

[_Some Schmo]

I think no matter who Trump nominated it was just going to be a dirty, knockdown, drag out fight.

Except that we can rely on Drumpf to pick the person most easily criticized. He's a douche bag divining rod.