Yet Another GOP Strategist arrested for sex trafficking minors

[ceeboo]

I think Cultellus is brilliant - He has things to say that are deeply thought provoking

Such as that I am ""foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical", a very forceful allegation for which you could evidently find no justification when I asked you to give some.

What is wrong with you, Chap? I gave you an answer to this already (and an apology - If you don't accept it, fine. I really don't care that you are so offended) - I'm not interested in holding your head while you cry foul - Good Lord, have you read some of the stuff that has been directed at other people on this board. Get a grip and stop playing the victim.

[canpakes]

That was something, canpakes.

Asked and answered.

Nope.

You can’t back up your lie.

It’s not needling you to say so, either.

Sorry that your gambit failed to save you from that.

[Gadianton]

It's not about caring what political party an abuser or trafficker belongs to, but caring if leaders within a particular party are abusers or traffickers. That's why QAnon, a fast-growing right-wing conspiracy manufacturer makes up lies involving the left and trafficking, because if such lies were true, they would be damning as hell.

These lies are becoming a real social ill, affecting the well-being of children:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5a7CV8U6vM

But all of this is okay for the conservatives of this board. (well, I'm sort of a conservative, and it's not okay for me, but for most of the others here)

what's not tolerable is pointing out a GOP strategist really is trafficking. That's worse than trafficking itself.

[ceeboo]

This might fit Ceeboo’s description of, “foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical”.

Cakes, I know you have serious struggles and limitations with coming up, processing, and sharing your individual thoughts that are born in your own skull - This explains why you only post by quoting others and adding a few insignificant words at the bottom of said posts that you quote - but try to pay attention in these threads/discussions. I know it's hard for you but you shoulkd at least make an effort. That wasn't "ceeboo's description."

Posting is a thing - it requires a measure of personal responsibility and ownership.

[Cultellus]

That was something, canpakes.

Asked and answered.

Nope.

You can’t back up your lie.

It’s not needling you to say so, either.

Sorry that your gambit failed to save you from that.

I did answer.
You misrepresented your history on this board. You continue to do that. If you are pretending that you do not antagonize one or more posters, feel free to make that case. The fact that you are doing it in this thread is enough to satisfy your question.

I have not lied. I have backed it up. You are doing exactly what Shades asked that volunteers not do, and not be, when he solicited volunteers. Get it together, pancakes. You can be and do whatever you want, and I can point out that it is problem or a contradiction of the conditions for being a moderator.

[K Graham]

Schmoe hit the nail on the head. Whenever a Right Winger makes an accusation against the Left, just consider it a confession.

[Cultellus]

This might fit Ceeboo’s description of, “foaming ranting ideological lunatic insane and illogical”.

Cakes, I know you have serious struggles and limitations with coming up, processing, and sharing your individual thoughts that are born in your own skull - This explains why you only post by quoting others and adding a few insignificant words at the bottom of said posts that you quote - but try to pay attention in these threads/discussions. I know it's hard for you but you shoulkd at least make an effort. That wasn't "ceeboo's description."

Posting is a thing - it requires a measure of personal responsibility and ownership.

He is so entrenched in his antagonist role against you, ceeboo, he can't see or think straight.

[Cultellus]

Schmoe hit the nail on the head. Whenever a Right Winger makes an accusation against the Left, just consider it a confession.

Another option would be to not make such an asinine conclusion, and stick to the facts.

K Graham/Cultellus - to the rescue again.

[Some Schmo]

Your feelings have no impact on reality/truth - they are just your feelings. Reality and truth (if you're interested in these things) would demand that you read the contents of a post before judging the post. Anything short of that is just foolishness.

So I guess you're going to go and listen to everything Limbaugh ever said and come back to revise your posts, huh? You wouldn't want to look foolish, would you?

I'll put aside the comment about being interested in reality and truth. You're too easy a target for that one.

A person only needs to lie a few times for me to stop believing what they say. If you find value in reading the words of chronic liars, go nuts. I choose not to waste my time.

To each their own - I have no problem with your choice but you probably shouldn't pass along your opinions/judgements about someone's posts if you don't even read the posts. Surely, that's at least reasonable isn't it?

I don't remember saying anything about that specific post except that I didn't read it.

Is there any food you don't like, ceeboo? If so, do you keep on eating it because maybe it'll taste different this time? You shouldn't pass along opinions of food unless you've tried every instance of that food. Surely, that's at least reasonable isn't it?

I've read enough of his posts to know he's a liar and not worth reading. Like I said about another poster when asked a similar question, I'm not willing to wade through a river of crap on the off chance I might find a kernel of corn.

My opinion is quite different than yours. I think Cultellus is brilliant - He has things to say that are deeply thought provoking - He is one of the most unique posters I have ever read on these boards - If nothing else, he is very much worth reading (there is no doubt about that in my opinion.)

Well, that's a reflection of you. Don't be surprised when people see his crap on you.

[Gadianton]

You can’t back up your lie.

Cultellus never backs up his accusations. "See, what you just said says it all". That's what he has to resort to. He did the same thing in another thread to save his accusation of me as "woke". I'm conscientious in my posts therefore woke and a bigot.

Canpakes isn't totally innocent, however. The other day on the walk we were talking about breakfast places and there's this brunch place near my house, and I brought it up. I couldn't find the word for what it was they were known for. I could picture it in my mind; batter and a hot pan resulting in a stack of these round things that you put butter and syrup on. But I couldn't get the word for them out of my mouth. I blame that on Canpakes.