Water Dog wrote:schreech wrote:WTF are you talking about? Facebook is not the internet. There is only ONE comcast therefore, monopoly!. There are, literally, thousands of social media companies that cater to every kind of freak and fetish. You are just not very good at logic are you?
Are you physically incapable of talking without insulting? What is wrong with you? Flashing your inferiority complex at me with invectives doesn't make you right. Did I say Facebook was the internet? No, I didn't. You keep talking about comprehension skills while repeatedly, over and over, failing to comprehend what I'm actually saying. Facebook is no more the internet than cell phone providers are the radio spectrum. Facebook is an independent communication network. It is a monopoly, with zero competitors, and has virtually 100% global market saturation.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-antitr ... 1516121561https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/22/1738 ... p-questionhttps://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-u ... 2018-04-11
Dude, you really don't seem to able to actually follow what you are arguing, at all, so its not surprising that you don't understand the responses people are writing to you. You are correct, insulting you doesn't make me right, being capable of logically following and responding to an argument while being right makes me right. Mocking you is just fun.
First, You literally said:
"Your web hosting company isn't the internet. There are thousands of such companies. There is only one Facebook. Do you really not understand the concept of a monopoly?"
There is only one hosting company with the name of my hosting company. There are thousands of other companies that do the same thing. My company has rules and regulations clients and users have to follow.
There is only one social media network with the name Facebook. There are dozens of other companies that do the same thing. Facebook has rules and regulations that clients and users have to follow.
...do you even understand MONOPOLY!??! You don't even know what you are trying to say as you mash out responses here.
Nothing you linked to suggested that any of these companies don't have a right to remove content that violates their terms and conditions. If they get broken up because they found to be monopolies, that will not change, they will still have their own terms and conditions and, as private businesses in the free market, will be able to regulate that content however they want. NOTHING YOU HAVE LINKED TO INDICATES THAT THERE IS AN ISSUE OF FREE SPEECH HERE WHICH IS THE PREMISE OF YOUR ENTIRE ARGUMENT NO MATTER HOW MANY TIME YOU FORGET WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT OR TRY TO MOVE THE GOAL POSTS.
Jesus, stay focused. A bunch of republicans fretting about how a private company might use its platform for its own use doesn't constitute any kind of infringement" on anyone's "free speech rights". That was your entire argument until you decided to move on to how Facebook might be a monopoly as if that ha anything to do with anyone's freedom of speech.
The govt is not limiting Alex Jone's ability to say whatever stupid crap he wants to say on whatever platform will allow him to. Facebook is not required to allow hate speech or anything else they find objectionable. Again, you are just wrong and the slippery slope fallacy is nonsense.
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
