Nick Fuentes Criticizes Trump

[Whiskey]

The House could and should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President today for the post directing Pam Bondi to go after his political enemies. The lack of a legitimate check on him is absolutely enabling the collapse into authoritarianism yet they have the authority given by the Constitution to prevent it if they would do their jobs rather than succumb. It could not be more clear that we are no longer functioning as a democracy as the picture painted for us by the actions of Congress right now.

Yep, and his followers thinks he's great.

Stupid, stupid people.

Fuentes agrees with you on that too.

[Whiskey]

The House could and should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President today for the post directing Pam Bondi to go after his political enemies. The lack of a legitimate check on him is absolutely enabling the collapse into authoritarianism yet they have the authority given by the Constitution to prevent it if they would do their jobs rather than succumb. It could not be more clear that we are no longer functioning as a democracy as the picture painted for us by the actions of Congress right now.

Trump should have been kicked out of office the first time. He should have never been permitted to run the second time. If it weren't for some greedy billionaire fascists, we would not be saddled with this total loser of a "president." They bought their Supreme Court Justices and Republican pols mostly so they could be richer than God and make the rest of us into their NPCs. Trump was the man who would carry out their will, so long as he got his billions by using the White House for personal and familial enrichment. All they had to do then was find a bunch of fools willing to vote for a con artist. I wish it had been harder for them to do so.

Also Biden quit and Kamala lost. Ever think of that?

[Kishkumen]

Also Biden quit and Kamala lost. Ever think of that?

The GOP could have run any other qualified, non-felonious candidate, too. Ever think of that?

Their eternal shame is that, given the sacred trust of vetting candidates for the general election, they foisted a destructive turd on the world.

[Whiskey]

Also Biden quit and Kamala lost. Ever think of that?

The GOP could have run any other qualified, non-felonious candidate, too. Ever think of that?

Their eternal shame is that, given the sacred trust of vetting candidates for the general election, they foisted a destructive turd on the world.

As opposed to not vetting the candidate?

[Kishkumen]

As opposed to not vetting the candidate?

Yeah, one would think they didn't vet him, seeing that they let Trump run in the first place.

[honorentheos]

The House could and should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President today for the post directing Pam Bondi to go after his political enemies. The lack of a legitimate check on him is absolutely enabling the collapse into authoritarianism yet they have the authority given by the Constitution to prevent it if they would do their jobs rather than succumb. It could not be more clear that we are no longer functioning as a democracy as the picture painted for us by the actions of Congress right now.

name one clean issue where one side's yelling "feds stay out" and the other's begging "feds dive in."

There are countless issues where policy and ideology differences mean some will demand government involvement where others want the government to stay out of the way. that's why the source for government authority, the recourse available to those who oppose government action, and who is benefited all matter.

Authoritarianism is the issue not political differences existing.

[Whiskey]

name one clean issue where one side's yelling "feds stay out" and the other's begging "feds dive in."

There are countless issues where policy and ideology differences mean some will demand government involvement where others want the government to stay out of the way. that's why the source for government authority, the recourse available to those who oppose government action, and who is benefited all matter.

Authoritarianism is the issue not political differences existing.

Countless? Okay. Perfect. Start with a dozen.

I’ll start. Not Abortion. The wings of both sides want the feds in. The middle wants the feds out.

Go for it. Show us a dozen of countless.

[canpakes]

There are countless issues where policy and ideology differences mean some will demand government involvement where others want the government to stay out of the way. that's why the source for government authority, the recourse available to those who oppose government action, and who is benefited all matter.

Authoritarianism is the issue not political differences existing.

Countless? Okay. Perfect. Start with a dozen.

I’ll start. Not Abortion. The wings of both sides want the feds in. The middle wants the feds out.

Go for it. Show us a dozen of countless.

Still stuck on this?

I like how you view a situation where the Federal Government allows access to abortion as an oppressive authoritarian burden.

[Whiskey]

Countless? Okay. Perfect. Start with a dozen.

I’ll start. Not Abortion. The wings of both sides want the feds in. The middle wants the feds out.

Go for it. Show us a dozen of countless.

Still stuck on this?

I like how you view a situation where the Federal Government allows access to abortion as an oppressive authoritarian burden.

Oppressive? Pancakes. Your hallucinations are remarkable.

I never said it was oppressive. You should consider facts. Is government health insurance oppressive?

Get the honor in here. We need a dozen or so of those countless examples.

[canpakes]

Still stuck on this?

I like how you view a situation where the Federal Government allows access to abortion as an oppressive authoritarian burden.

Oppressive? Pancakes. Your hallucinations are remarkable.

I never said it was oppressive. You should consider facts. Is government health insurance oppressive?

Get the honor in here. We need a dozen or so of those countless examples.

Strike ‘oppressive’, then. Is it an authoritarian burden?

Don’t be afraid to commit to an opinion.