Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
You are a victim of confirmation bias.
And you have the habit of misrepresenting and misunderstanding my points.
Don’t gaslight me, bro. As I’ve said, you’ve worn out the “imprecise wording” excuse. You had to go to the two different threads to copy the three quotes, but you only posted a link to one thread. You claimed I “immediately challenged a post”, when the two posts were three days apart. Three days is not literally or figuratively immediate. You described my post as a” challenge “ of yours. The truth was that my post wasn’t even a response to the post you claimed I challenged you on.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 5:20 amIt's true I misrepresented the papers on that occasion. Science doesn't know when the brain is fully mature, science doesn't even know what brain maturity is. I suspect you knew and never bothered to mentioned that.
You corrected me, but you never bother to correct others.
1. What have I been saying for hours about going after my imprecise wording? Jesus Christ, you are doing it again. Just take it as figuratively, "immediately" can mean many things.Res Ipsa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 5:07 amNow, check the date on what what DT described as my “immediate” response: May 1, 2022. Not “immediately challenged” — three days had passed. You’ll also note the the part of my post that he quoted was not a response to the post he quoted; It was to an entirely different post.
2. I don't have time to quote the direct response because you messed up the posts. It's like paraphrasing. It's sad how you keep accusing me of lying for small details.
Now, can you acknowledge that there's a correlation between social exclusion and aggression? It may be the case that ending social exclusion would make the world a safer place. But you don't give a rat's.
BS! at the same time I am the only one who shares a lot of sources, so it's not surprising that I am wrong sometimes. However, you frequently misunderstand my points.
I doubt it, not with the same intensity. Marcus and Morley misrepresented Baumeister's paper, but you didn't tell them anything .https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11761307/
Res Ipsa wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 2:22 amNo. The quote from science daily says what the paper says. It talks about brain maturity, I.e., the point at which the prefrontal cortex is fully developed. The paper does not talk about mature cognition or behavior.I understand, but why would one of the authors of the 2018 paper tell sciencedaily, "In other words, the brain become "mature" too soon"? Was Tyborowska playing word games? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 094830.htm
you want me to befriend High School students? You can't outthink the outthinker.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 7:58 amdoubtingthomas, how many lonely males have you befriended in order to prevent them from becoming violent?
Hold the phone. . . Your point this whole time is that the proclivity toward violence and mysogyny ceases to exist, and lonely males stop listening to red pill sources, once they graduate from high school?doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 5:55 pmyou want me to befriend High School students? You can't outthink the outthinker.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 7:58 amdoubtingthomas, how many lonely males have you befriended in order to prevent them from becoming violent?
I'm 100% serious about helping you achieve your most important goal.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 5:52 pmBS! at the same time I am the only one who shares a lot of sources, so it's not surprising that I am wrong sometimes. However, you frequently misunderstand my points.
I doubt it, not with the same intensity. Marcus and Morley misrepresented Baumeister's paper, but you didn't tell them anything .https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11761307/
And the concern of the authors was clearly about the possibility that social exclusion leads to violent behavior, so I didn't badly misrepresent the paper as you claimed.
Let me ask you, what is mature cognition or behavior?
The majority of guys who listen to the Red Pill are in their late teens and early 20s.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 6:15 pmHold the phone. . . Your point this whole time is that the proclivity toward violence and mysogyny ceases to exist, and lonely males stop listening to red pill sources, once they graduate from high school?
Let’s hope this attitude extends to the fairer sex.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Thu Apr 27, 2023 12:37 amThe majority of guys who listen to the Red Pill are in their late teens and early 20s.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 6:15 pmHold the phone. . . Your point this whole time is that the proclivity toward violence and mysogyny ceases to exist, and lonely males stop listening to red pill sources, once they graduate from high school?
Do you want me to start talking to 18 year old guys? Should I be like: Hey kids, let's be friends.