Page 1 of 1

Democrats initiate Orwellian Censorship

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:36 am
by _bcspace
Carter & Co. Kick House Censors

The Special Orders hour was led by Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), secretary of the House Republican Conference and a former District Judge. He told the story of the demands of the commission that he remove the words “government run healthcare” and “Democratic majority” from a constituent invitation to a telephone town hall meeting.


“The Franking Commission came back and told me I could not say ‘government run healthcare’ and I could not say the ‘Democratic Party.’ I had to say ‘the majority party is submitting its public option healthcare program.’ In other words what they’re telling me is that I have to use the same language that the President of the United States uses in his speech or that [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi uses when she talks about this. ‘Public option.’”

....

“They have never before in the history of the Republic taken the position that you do not have the right to express your opinion on the policies that are being proposed, or that you must reword the language to suit the policies of someone else,” Carter said.

...

But there are more examples of the Democrats abuse of the franking approval system. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) is having his chart (pdf) Republican staff created in the Joint Economic Committee illustrating the structure of Democrat, government run healthcare censored out of some 20 member mailings. But it does not stop there.

Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.) sends a regular newsletter to his constituents. When he attempted to mail a newsletter to his district covering the issue of healthcare, he was forced to remove the following offensive language before Democrats on the commission would approve payment of postage for the mailing:

“The below quote is from President Obama at a recent town hall on health care, responding to a question on possible medical treatment for an elderly woman who had heart problems and received a pacemaker:

‘Look, the first thing for all of us to understand that is we actually have some -- some choices to make about how we want to deal with our own end-of-life care… we as a culture and as a society [can start] to make better decisions within our own families and for ourselves...at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.’


Even a quote from Obama is censored!?

The bottom line is that democrats cannot maintain control or get their ideas passed without lying about the message. That socialism requires a dictatorship is also evidenced here.

Re: Democrats initiate Orwellian Censorship

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:46 am
by _JohnStuartMill
If the Franking Commission is involved, it's probably because the Republicans were trying to take advantage of their congressional privilege. If that's the case, then the Democrats weren't engaging in Orwellian censorship; they were trying to prevent the Republicans from campaigning on the taxpayer's dime.

Re: Democrats initiate Orwellian Censorship

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:11 am
by _bcspace
According to liberals, any version of the truth is campaigning for the other side. Are any of the examples given examples of campaigning? Of course not. This is simply a blatant attempt to control the message.

Re: Democrats initiate Orwellian Censorship

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:09 am
by _moksha
bcspace wrote:According to liberals, any version of the truth is campaigning for the other side. Are any of the examples given examples of campaigning? Of course not. This is simply a blatant attempt to control the message.


Those liberals are trying to take away from the Republican's right to use public dollars for partisan politics. Good thing a Democrat did not try to do the same thing or Fox Media could have spent many hours abusing that Congress person for trying to circumvent truth, justice and the American way.

Re: Democrats initiate Orwellian Censorship

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:31 pm
by _bcspace
Those liberals are trying to take away from the Republican's right to use public dollars for partisan politics.


Incorrect. For example, the terms "public" and "government run" technically mean the same thing but are both politically charged in different directions. By allowing only one of them to be used proves that the now Democratic controlled Franking Commission is only interested in controlling the message in a way favorable to them.