CNS News: Rep. Bart Stupak (D.-Mich.) told CNSNews.com that President Barack Obama told him in a telephone conversation that when he said in his Sept. 9 speech to a joint session of Congress that “under our plan no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions” he was not talking about the actual bill drafted in the House but about the president’s own health care plan—which has never been written.
Nice to know that we have another lawyer as President and it depends on what the definition of is is. Bill Clinton may be a honest man compared to Obama.
Note that Obama called Republican attacks on Democratic House and Senate bills lies. Why are they lies? Because his mythical plan, which has never been introduced, may not contain these features. What does that have to do with arguments about the House and Senate bills? Nothing. Does Obama know his arguments are lies. I vote yes since I don't think he's that stupid (he is ignorant on a fair number of matters as shown by comments indicating that he thinks Austrian is a language and that Hirohito signed the surrender on the Missouri). This type of deception is rife with Obama. I noticed it years ago.
Obama's lies and deceptions are gradually becoming clear even to the Democrats.
Democrats, having defeated a Republican attempt to block proposed Medicare cuts, now face an even bigger headache: concern among members of their own party over the program’s future funding.
President Barack Obama wants to cut spending on the federal insurance plan for the elderly to help fund his health-care overhaul. Part of that proposal would cut more than $100 billion from Medicare Advantage, through which the government hires private insurers such as Humana Inc. to deliver Medicare benefits to 11 million seniors, including extras like reduced co-payments and even gym memberships.
Should Congress scale back the program, “We’re not going to be able to say ‘if you like what you have, you can keep it,’” said Senator Bob Casey, a Pennsylvania Democrat. “And that basic commitment that a lot of us around here have made will be called into question.”
Here is the Ultra-Liberal (D) and Pro-Abortion Senator Barbara Boxer of California:
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. greets participants after speaking at a rally to stop the abortion coverage ban in health care reform, Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
U.S. Senate (2003-2004) 108th Congress, Combined Sessions
...
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) O O O O O O O O O O O 0 11 0%
U.S. Senate (2005-2006) 109th Congress, Combined Sessions
...
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) O O O O 0 4 0%
U.S. Senate (2007-2008) 110th Congress, Combined Sessions
...
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) O O O O O O O 0 7 0%
U.S. Senate (2009) 111th Congress, Combined Sessions
...
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) O O O 0 3 0%
They Are All 0%, For the Pro-Abortion Senator Barbara Boxer of California.
Senator Barbara Boxer of California, is up again for Re-Election in 2010.
The State of California hasn't had a Republican U.S. Senator since 1992. And, With there now being as many as 58 Democrats and with just 40 Republicans in the U.S. Senate, it is time for California to Dump Senator Barbara Boxer in 2010.
