Should spreading HIV be legal?

[Gadianton]

In theory at least, you can go to jail for "recklessly" infecting others with HIV

I have a real problem with this. How can the government tell a person who they can or can't have relations with, is this 1984 or something? Can't people have a difference of opinion on the reality of HIV?

And why should we have to protect the weak? If people have faith in God and don't live in fear, have a protestant work ethic, and get plenty of vitamin D from the sun, then they'll beat the virus. Plain and simple. Everyone I know has unprotected sex all the time, including a couple minister friends, and sometimes with people who have the so-called "AIDS" and they've never get sick. On the other hand, all these people on welfare looking for a handout, I'm sure for them it would all be over. Well, as Rush Limbaugh used to say, good riddance to them.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

I think the government promoting condom use was definitely to push the globohomosexual pan communist agenda, and laid the foundation for mass control by normalizing subordinate behavior to (((bureaucrats))). It’s a well-known fact that condoms aren’t 100% effective at preventing the spread of disease, and that the infection rate of HIV per sexual interaction was and is miniscule. Additionally, forcing the American taxpayer to support the CDC and ‘science industry’ laid the groundwork of more socialism, ie, universal healthcare. It’s stealing from Peter to pay for Paul’s degeneracy. Look, if those “f’s” want to have their butt sex that’s on them, but I shouldn’t have to take food from my family’s table to pay for their mistakes. That’s theft.

- Doc

[canpakes]

I think the government promoting condom use was definitely to push the globohomosexual pan communist agenda … It’s a well-known fact that condoms aren’t 100% effective at preventing the spread of disease …

I don’t know why you would insist on tiptoeing around the facts when they’ve been so thoroughly exposed by OAN’s Jack Posobiec. It’s not ‘the government’; please don’t besmirch the fine conservatives working to protect your vital seed from being squelched out by Shields of Satan when this promotion of condoms has, in fact, been organized and promoted specifically and exclusively by pedophile balloon industry cronies and Jezebels of the Demoncratic Party that get off on forcing their fetishizing of wrapping your freedom member in their suffocating baby-killing latex death traps.

OAN’s Jack Posobiec Exposes Democrat’s Evil Plan to Snuff Out Your Conservative Freedom Seed

[Jersey Girl]

I got nothing.

[Moksha]

Gadianton has exposed a fundamental flaw in current conservatism: It cares nothing for the wellbeing of the general public. If they did care then they would be in favor of curtailing the spread of dangerous diseases.

[ajax18]

In theory at least, you can go to jail for "recklessly" infecting others with HIV

I have a real problem with this. How can the government tell a person who they can or can't have relations with, is this 1984 or something? Can't people have a difference of opinion on the reality of HIV?

And why should we have to protect the weak? If people have faith in God and don't live in fear, have a protestant work ethic, and get plenty of vitamin D from the sun, then they'll beat the virus. Plain and simple. Everyone I know has unprotected sex all the time, including a couple minister friends, and sometimes with people who have the so-called "AIDS" and they've never get sick. On the other hand, all these people on welfare looking for a handout, I'm sure for them it would all be over. Well, as Rush Limbaugh used to say, good riddance to them.

It's a systemically homophobic law written by Republicans as an attack on the gay community. If we don't vote out all Republicans, our treasured San Francisco bath houses could be no more.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

I think the government promoting condom use was definitely to push the globohomosexual pan communist agenda … It’s a well-known fact that condoms aren’t 100% effective at preventing the spread of disease …

I don’t know why you would insist on tiptoeing around the facts when they’ve been so thoroughly exposed by OAN’s Jack Posobiec. It’s not ‘the government’; please don’t besmirch the fine conservatives working to protect your vital seed from being squelched out by Shields of Satan when this promotion of condoms has, in fact, been organized and promoted specifically and exclusively by pedophile balloon industry cronies and Jezebels of the Demoncratic Party that get off on forcing their fetishizing of wrapping your freedom member in their suffocating baby-killing latex death traps.

OAN’s Jack Posobiec Exposes Democrat’s Evil Plan to Snuff Out Your Conservative Freedom Seed

Thanks for the link, I think it perfectly illustrates how our GOP friends in Congress and the Senate are working tirelessly on our behalf to keep the government from overreaching and overstepping its original intent as framed by the Founding Fathers. If people want to have butt sex why am I being constantly inundated with ‘wear a condom’ messages when catching HIV is statistically lower than catching the cold? Do I have to wear a condom around my pecker when some multi vitamins and damned a good woman is enough? And why are (((they))) constantly trying to get me to pay for (((their))) agenda? Why do (((they))) insist on opening the borders and allowing third worlders to flood into my country? I don’t even recognize this place any more.

- Doc

[Gadianton]

Masks and vaccine requirements are totalitarian laws written by Republicans as an attack on humanity. If we don't vote out all Republicans, our treasured Trump conventions could be no more.

Thanks Ajax, I kind of agree.

[Moksha]

This is such a stupid damned comment it cannot be trolled or lampooned. It is that damned stupid.

If the statement was not true, it would not have dawn a rise out of you. Trump worshippers do not care about the public well-being.

[Chap]

Gadianton has exposed a fundamental flaw in current conservatism: It cares nothing for the wellbeing of the general public. If they did care then they would be in favor of curtailing the spread of dangerous diseases.

It would be interesting to hear evidence on the other side of this claim. Can we have some examples, please, of how leading Republican politicians such as Mitch McConnell have recently advocated effective actions to limit the spread of the COVD virus? If so by whom, when, and what were the actions proposed?