Page 1 of 1
WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:15 pm
by _Ceeboo
The presupposition is presumed to be a salient point where misinformed methods are derived in a variety of polemical agendas driven with a context of vitriol used in an attempt to digress the progression of the false pretenses that find solace in degenerate diversion of perpetuated personal conclusions resulting in the falsehoods that wither and deflect possible congruency that commonly results in things mostly non sequitur.
Sorry, been hanging around MDB too long.
Peace,
Ceeboo
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:17 pm
by _Kishkumen
I see Wade speak, but the spelling is too good to be Wade's.
Ceeboo wrote:The presupposition is presumed to be a salient point where misinformed methods are derived in a variety of polemical agendas driven with a context of vitriol used in an attempt to digress the progression of the false pretenses that find solace in degenerate diversion of perpetuated personal conclusions resulting in the falsehoods that wither and deflect possible congruency that commonly results in things mostly non sequitur.
Sorry, been hanging around MDB too long.
Peace,
Ceeboo
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:21 pm
by _MCB
Dangit. That is a gem. The message is, "You are too dumb to understand this, so there!!" Not only that, but the use of projection is a classic. I wish I could use this in my book as an example of Mo-speak. Do you think I could get away with it?
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:35 pm
by _Redefined
Ceeboo wrote:"The presupposition is presumed"
Isn't that a bit redundant?
Shades clean this up for us ASAP!
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:42 pm
by _Buffalo
MCB wrote:Dangit. That is a gem. The message is, "You are too dumb to understand this, so there!! Not only that, but the use of projection is a classic. I wish I could use this in my book as an example of Mo-speak. Do you think I could get away with it?
It's meaningless, contradictory and redundant. No true pedant would be impressed by this amateur attempt at pedantry.
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:54 pm
by _MCB
So you think the true author would be embarrassed to admit it is his production? Then I can use it!! :)) TY for common sense.
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:38 pm
by _Ceeboo
Buffalo wrote:
It's meaningless, contradictory and redundant. No true pedant would be impressed by this amateur attempt at pedantry.
You noticed?
Peace,
Ceeboo
Re: WHAAAAAAAAAAT?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:47 pm
by _Buffalo
Ceeboo wrote:Buffalo wrote:
It's meaningless, contradictory and redundant. No true pedant would be impressed by this amateur attempt at pedantry.
You noticed?
Peace,
Ceeboo
;)
On the other hand, I have to admire to sort of mind that put those words together. That paragraph made my eyes water. The earwax ran out of my ears. He should be running Oceania's Ministry of Truth.