Page 1 of 1

Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:34 am
by _bcspace

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:36 am
by _moksha
I always liked that conservative line:

(mechanical deep breathing) "What is thy bidding Master?" (more mechanical deep breathing)

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:29 pm
by _Baker


Given your willingness to take it from behind by every elephant you see, it's easy to understand your affection for this video.

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:54 am
by _bcspace
Actually, I posted it as a courtesy for those, like you, who consume much alcohol.

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:42 pm
by _JohnStuartMill
bcspace wrote:Actually, I posted it as a courtesy for those, like you, who consume much alcohol.

Intelligent people are more likely to binge drink, which could explain why you're a teetotaler.

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:08 pm
by _Baker
bcspace wrote:Actually, I posted it as a courtesy for those, like you, who consume much alcohol.


That was very thoughtful of you.

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:07 am
by _bcspace
Actually, I posted it as a courtesy for those, like you, who consume much alcohol.

Intelligent people are more likely to binge drink, which could explain why you're a teetotaler.


Seems only to be a hypothesis. But I did enjoy this article:

Why conservative policies work better than liberal policies

Re: Evolution of Liberals and Conservatives for beer drinkers

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:55 pm
by _JohnStuartMill
bcspace wrote:Seems only to be a hypothesis. But I did enjoy this article:

Why conservative policies work better than liberal policies

Kanazawa apparently doesn't understand that the naturalistic fallacy is bi-directional. That's one reason he's a laughingstock among social scientists.