a question of manners?
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:06 pm
When you travel by airplane, you're called on board by zones. I'm assuming we'd all agree that it is good manners to go when your zone is called and not before. So why do people go on board before their seating zone is called? What I've seen happening a lot is people placing their carryon bags in the overhead compartment 4-5 rows in front of their seat. This way they get to exit the plane first. Of course when I got on the plane their bags were over my space and hence I had to wait until last to get off the plane. Is this just a wise maneuver on their part or would I be right in labelling this as bad manners, similar to cutting in line.
The first flight attendant I questioned about it wouldn't answer my question which I posed similar to what I posed above. He just called security on me. The security officer was white and since he didn't seem to have a reason to favor the black woman who had done this to me as the black flight attendant did, he admitted to me that it was wrong but that they could only stop it if they caught them in the act. All I had a right to from my ticket purchase was the seat, my bag was placed at the flight attendants discretion. Now would I have been willing to help an old woman or make something more convenient for a mother with kids? Sure, but that wasn't what was going on here. I've seen many able bodied young men and women do the same thing. And in the eyes of most people there the only sinner was me for having questioned what was done. I'm not sure what directs peoples view of right and wrong in this way or was it just a case of favoritism? I confronted two black men who cut in line in front of me at the courthouse. I was scolded by the clerk for questioning them if they had been waiting in line. I was told I was lucky I didn't get shot. That was probably true but I think the ethical outlook of the clerk was skewed. They were wrong for cutting in line not me for speaking up for myself and everyone else who was waiting in line. But in the end, security was called, the clerk still waited on the line hoppers first, security never came, and in the end they got their way.
Is a space in line worth getting shot over? A large part of me believes that it is. It's a question of right and wrong and to an extent a question of self respect and honor. Are there thieves on the street? Are you wrong for walking down the street? Are their rapists on the street? Does that make a woman wrong for walking down the street to the store after dark? I don't think so, but the other side would contend, if she had just waited until tomorrow to go to the store she wouldn't have been killed. Going to the store wasn't worth losing her life and she knew that there were thieves out after dark. How much does another man have to steal from you before you say, "Ok, this is worth a confrontation." If you want to fight, we'll fight, but I'm not going to let you do this to me without fighting to stick up for myself. In my case, I wasn't even allowed to verbally state my case. Had the security officer been black as well I'd probably be sitting in jail right now, all for saying that I didn't think it was right.
The first flight attendant I questioned about it wouldn't answer my question which I posed similar to what I posed above. He just called security on me. The security officer was white and since he didn't seem to have a reason to favor the black woman who had done this to me as the black flight attendant did, he admitted to me that it was wrong but that they could only stop it if they caught them in the act. All I had a right to from my ticket purchase was the seat, my bag was placed at the flight attendants discretion. Now would I have been willing to help an old woman or make something more convenient for a mother with kids? Sure, but that wasn't what was going on here. I've seen many able bodied young men and women do the same thing. And in the eyes of most people there the only sinner was me for having questioned what was done. I'm not sure what directs peoples view of right and wrong in this way or was it just a case of favoritism? I confronted two black men who cut in line in front of me at the courthouse. I was scolded by the clerk for questioning them if they had been waiting in line. I was told I was lucky I didn't get shot. That was probably true but I think the ethical outlook of the clerk was skewed. They were wrong for cutting in line not me for speaking up for myself and everyone else who was waiting in line. But in the end, security was called, the clerk still waited on the line hoppers first, security never came, and in the end they got their way.
Is a space in line worth getting shot over? A large part of me believes that it is. It's a question of right and wrong and to an extent a question of self respect and honor. Are there thieves on the street? Are you wrong for walking down the street? Are their rapists on the street? Does that make a woman wrong for walking down the street to the store after dark? I don't think so, but the other side would contend, if she had just waited until tomorrow to go to the store she wouldn't have been killed. Going to the store wasn't worth losing her life and she knew that there were thieves out after dark. How much does another man have to steal from you before you say, "Ok, this is worth a confrontation." If you want to fight, we'll fight, but I'm not going to let you do this to me without fighting to stick up for myself. In my case, I wasn't even allowed to verbally state my case. Had the security officer been black as well I'd probably be sitting in jail right now, all for saying that I didn't think it was right.