DiscussMormonism.com

What you make you think that union man who punched the douchebag from fox news was a liberal?

The fact that you and the liberals who control the mainstream media don't condemn it shows the lefts double standard on violence.

ajax18 wrote:

What you make you think that union man who punched the douchebag from fox news was a liberal?

The fact that you and the liberals who control the mainstream media don't condemn it shows the lefts double standard on violence.

The douchebag "contributor" from Fox news wanted to get punched, he shoved his face in front of union protestors and he got punched.

The douchebag got what he wanted, his punchable face on the news. The right wing media got what they wanted, victim status. What and who should I condemn? Its a free country. People who want to get free publicity and promote their career as a douchebag right wing news contributor for Fox News by getting their face punched, should have the right to get their face punched.

As far a doublestandard, when a msnbc douchebag contributor seeks publicity by sticking his face in a right wing rally knowing he is going to get punched, and gets punch, and I throw a hissy fit about it, then by all means you can call me a hypocrite.

By the way, not everyone on the left is a pacifist who abhors violence. If you don't believe me, ask bin Laden. Oh that's right, you can't. He's dead.

ajax18 wrote:

What you make you think that union man who punched the douchebag from fox news was a liberal?

The fact that you and the liberals who control the mainstream media don't condemn it shows the lefts double standard on violence.

I hereby denounce the fact that some guy I don't know, and whose religious/political/philosophical affiliation I don't know (given the demographics of America, he was likely Christian, which makes me wonder why more Christians aren't condemning it ), punched another guy.

Hopefully the guy can get some counseling, or at the very least, grow up.

Jaybear wrote:The douchebag "contributor" from Fox news wanted to get punched, he shoved his face in front of union protestors and he got punched.

The douchebag got what he wanted, his punchable face on the news. The right wing media got what they wanted, victim status. What and who should I condemn? Its a free country. People who want to get free publicity and promote their career as a douchebag right wing news contributor for Fox News by getting their face punched, should have the right to get their face punched.

As far a doublestandard, when a msnbc douchebag contributor seeks publicity by sticking his face in a right wing rally knowing he is going to get punched, and gets punch, and I throw a hissy fit about it, then by all means you can call me a hypocrite.

By the way, not everyone on the left is a pacifist who abhors violence. If you don't believe me, ask bin Laden. Oh that's right, you can't. He's dead.

1. Jaybear is the Democratic party base, the typical Democrat "low information voter" who really shouldn't be voting at all in a free, constitutional republic, but prefers doing so in an attempt to punish all the enemies of his tribe. This is what we are facing.

2. While violence, and especially mob violence, is quite common on the Left (and came to be one of unionism's favored tactics of persuasion sense the 1930s), conservatives never punch protesters in their midst, or at least, this happens so rarely that its a virtually unknown phenomenon in American political life.

3. You really need to get out more, do a bit more reading, a bit more thinking, and a bit more contemplating of "the terrible questions."

Droopy wrote:
1. Jaybear is the Democratic party base, the typical Democrat "low information voter" who really shouldn't be voting at all in a free, constitutional republic, but prefers doing so in an attempt to punish all the enemies of his tribe. This is what we are facing.

Your point being?

2. While violence, and especially mob violence, is quite common on the Left (and came to be one of unionism's favored tactics of persuasion sense the 1930s), conservatives never punch protesters in their midst, or at least, this happens so rarely that its a virtually unknown phenomenon in American political life.

Union protestors are to the democrats what anti-abortion protestors are to the republican.
Passionate, single minded, and often volatile.

3. You really need to get out more, do a bit more reading, a bit more thinking, and a bit more contemplating of "the terrible questions."

How did you become so smart and well informed? Watching Fox News, listening to Glen Beck, and reading World Nut Daily?

Jaybear wrote:quote="Droopy"
1. Jaybear is the Democratic party base, the typical Democrat "low information voter" who really shouldn't be voting at all in a free, constitutional republic, but prefers doing so in an attempt to punish all the enemies of his tribe. This is what we are facing.

Your point being?

My point being the point.

Union protestors are to the democrats what anti-abortion protestors are to the republican. Passionate, single minded, and often volatile.

Sorry, Jay, but it just won't wash. The tiny handful of isolated, deranged individual criminals who bombed a tiny handful of abortion clinics in the 90s cannot be compared to a standard modus operandi. Violence is very rare and not condoned by, and is philosophically inconsistent with conservative principles.

It is and always has been endemic on the Left, either in incipient form or as an accepted technique of overcoming deliberative, democratic majority opposition and constitutional barriers to ideological goals. It is a major means by which the Left has always overcome legislative or judicial restriction on the acquisition and wielding of power in open, free societies.

How did you become so smart and well informed? Watching Fox News, listening to Glen Beck, and reading World Nut Daily?

No. Nearly 30 years of heavy reading, study, writing and thinking, and staying glued to C-SPAN.

What you make you think that union man who punched the douchebag from fox news was a liberal?

The fact that you and the liberals who control the mainstream media don't condemn it shows the lefts double standard on violence.

That plus anyone who's against the right to work is a liberal. No matter what they think on anything else, they voted Democrat and therefore support liberal values. Makes sense because one of those values is Socialism. You know Obama is just a union boss don't you? He looks at the federal budget and salivates the same way a union boss looks at a company's budget and salivates, wondering what he can plunder next.

bcspace wrote:
That plus anyone who's against the right to work is a liberal. No matter what they think on anything else, they voted Democrat and therefore support liberal values. Makes sense because one of those values is Socialism. You know Obama is just a union boss don't you? He looks at the federal budget and salivates the same way a union boss looks at a company's budget and salivates, wondering what he can plunder next.

George Romney: "I oppose right to work laws."

So what is this "liberal" union protestor's position on:
capital punishment
gun control
abortion rights
affirmative action
welfare assistance
gay rights
Obama care
separation of church and state

You say he voted democrat. How do you know that? Could be he voted for the Mich. Governor who did not campaign on right to work.

"Just know one thing, Rick Snyder: You sign that bill, you won't get no rest," said Rev. Charles Williams II at the Tuesday rally in Lansing, according to Michigan Capitol Confidential. "We'll meet you on Geddes Road. We'll be at your daughter's soccer game. We'll visit you at your church. We'll be at your office."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4ZB5722P6o

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/pro-union-activist-michigan-governor-well-be-your-daughters-soccer-game_666554.html

One of the Democrat's house slaves obviously.

Droopy wrote:Violence is very rare and not condoned by, and is philosophically inconsistent with conservative principles.

Yes, when one thinks of a modern conservative, the first thing that comes to mind is someone who shuns violence as a means of resolving disputes.