Page 1 of 1

Republicans - the unanswerable question...

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:38 am
by _Drifting
"What is Romney going to do that Obama isn't already doing?"

Re: Republicans - the unanswerable question...

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:43 am
by _bcspace
Repeal, delay, interfere with Obamacare for starters. This is the biggest tax on the middle class ever.

Re: Republicans - the unanswerable question...

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:40 am
by _Drifting
bcspace wrote:Repeal, delay, interfere with Obamacare for starters. This is the biggest tax on the middle class ever.


Is that it?
You're saying the one thing that springs to your mind in answer to the question is that Romney will flip flop from that which he was previously for, when governor? :lol:

Re: Republicans - the unanswerable question...

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:42 pm
by _bcspace
There are plenty of things and you apparently forgot about the one I happened to mention. Appointment of judges that are more likely to be conservative is another. The inability for Democrats to get Socialist and other liberal legislation signed is yet another.

Those in and of themselves are almost all we need besides the undoing and rollbacks of other off-the-cliff bills, executive orders, and court decisions etc. It's not rational to judge an administration by the amount of legislation passed, especially when one is looking for smaller less intrusive government.

Re: Republicans - the unanswerable question...

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:10 am
by _ajax18
bcspace wrote:Repeal, delay, interfere with Obamacare for starters. This is the biggest tax on the middle class ever.


It's amazing what it has come to. My current wish from the government, "Please do not take away the healthcare I've worked all my life for and only recently managed to obtain and give it away to someone else. Few Americans will ever encounter a worse enemy than their own government.

Re: Republicans - the unanswerable question...

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:32 am
by _Drifting
bcspace wrote:There are plenty of things and you apparently forgot about the one I happened to mention. Appointment of judges that are more likely to be conservative is another. The inability for Democrats to get Socialist and other liberal legislation signed is yet another.

Those in and of themselves are almost all we need besides the undoing and rollbacks of other off-the-cliff bills, executive orders, and court decisions etc. It's not rational to judge an administration by the amount of legislation passed, especially when one is looking for smaller less intrusive government.


So you believe Romney is going to deliver a "smaller less intrusive government" if he can flip flop his way into enough votes?