Page 1 of 1

Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls...

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:21 pm
by _Bond James Bond
(Title inspired by a Daily Kos blog entry so no hate on plagarism):

...According to the National Review, a conservative s***-rag, anyway.

https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/articles/313504/boss

You want off-the-charts status? Check out the curriculum vitae of one Willard M. Romney: $200 million in the bank (and a hell of a lot more if he didn’t give so much away), apex alpha executive, CEO, chairman of the board, governor, bishop, boss of everything he’s ever touched. Son of the same, father of more. It is a curious scientific fact (explained in evolutionary biology by the Trivers-Willard hypothesis — Willard, notice) that high-status animals tend to have more male offspring than female offspring, which holds true across many species, from red deer to mink to Homo sap. The offspring of rich families are statistically biased in favor of sons — the children of the general population are 51 percent male and 49 percent female, but the children of the Forbes billionaire list are 60 percent male. Have a gander at that Romney family picture: five sons, zero daughters. Romney has 18 grandchildren, and they exceed a 2:1 ratio of grandsons to granddaughters (13:5). When they go to church at their summer-vacation home, the Romney clan makes up a third of the congregation. He is basically a tribal chieftain.

Professor Obama? Two daughters. May as well give the guy a cardigan. And fallopian tubes.


Now I know he's trying to emasculate the President but ladies of the board how does this make you feel? Other choice quotes that make my flesh crawl:

Age is cruel to women, and subordination is cruel to men.


We don’t do harems here, of course, but Romney is exactly the kind of guy who in another time and place would have the option of maintaining one. He’s a boss.


Now Romney should quit pretending that he’s an ordinary schmo with ordinary schmo problems and start living a little larger. He should not be ashamed of being loaded; instead, he should have some fun with it. He will discover something that the Obama campaign has not quite figured out yet: Americans do not hate rich people. Americans love rich people. Americans will sit on their couches and watch billionaire Donald Trump fire people on television — for fun.


George Romney made his money by being a boss — a leader. Mitt Romney has been the same thing. When things went wrong, people put Romney in charge of them — at Bain, at the Olympics, at a hundred companies he helped turn around or restructure. Bain is a financial firm, but Romney wasn’t some Wall Street bank-monkey with a pitch book. He was the guy who fired you. He was a boss, like his dad, and like his sons probably will be. Barack Obama was never in charge of anything of any significance until the delicate geniuses who make up the electorate of this fine republic handed him the keys to the Treasury and the nuclear football because we were tired of Frenchmen sneering at us when we went on vacation. Obama made his money in part through political connections — no, I don’t think Michelle Obama was worth nearly 400 grand a year — and by authoring two celebrity memoirs, his sole innovation in life having been to write the memoir first and become a celebrity second. Can you imagine Barack Obama trying to pull off a hostile takeover without Rahm Emanuel holding his diapers up for him? Impossible.


Alright I do want to comment on this crap. Paul Ryan said the same thing when he said he wasn't depressed about flipping burgers. Yeah there's a reason. Even if you "give all your money away" you still have tons of political connections that make it much easier to achieve success in life Mitt and Paul. Mitt's dad was a governor and CEO. Paul Ryan was part of a large family business that made its fortune off government contracts and then he's been on the government dole for most of his life. Anyway...

Elections are not about public policy. They aren’t even about the economy. Elections are tribal, and tribes are — Occupy types, cover your delicate ears — ruthlessly hierarchical. Somebody has to be the top dog.


Great. Then let's have Obama and Mitt fight to the death with blunt objects. I suspect Obama, basketball player and generally younger man, would whip Mitt like an under preforming dressage horse. Shut the “F” up Kevin D. Williamson you sexist asshole.

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:27 pm
by _Jason Bourne
Wow!

Lets go back to the cave.

Seesh! :surprised:

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:00 pm
by _TrashcanMan79

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:06 pm
by _aussieguy55
I have four beautiful daughters and proud of it.

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:14 pm
by _bcspace
I have 5 daughters and 2 sons so I must be low down on the evolutionary scale. At least I'm smart enough to realize that the Daily Kos is the real s***-rag.

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:17 pm
by _aussieguy55
The National Review is a conservative mag.

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:08 pm
by _MeDotOrg
Interestingly, fraternal birth order is a fairly strong predictor of sexual orientation. The theory (and I emphasize theory) is that the more males a woman births, the more adept her body becomes at what is called "an in-utero maternal immune response."

This does not mean if you are the youngest of 5 brothers from the same mother you will automatically buy a lot of Judy Garland records and watch Project Runway. It simply means that the more older brothers your mother has birthed, the more likely she will be to have an "n-utero maternal immune response".

As far as the whole 'tribal chieftan' argument, look at Bush (41), Dole, Kemp and McCain. WWII hero, WWII hero, Pro Football quarterback, Navy fighter pilot. A lot of testosterone that didn't win. Look at Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir. (Well, don't look too closely at Golda Meir.)

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:48 pm
by _Bond James Bond
Last few Presidents:

Obama : 2 daughters
Bush 43: 2 daughters
Clinton: 1 daughter
Bush 41: 4 sons 2 daughters
Reagan : 2 daughters (1 adopted son)
Carter: 3 sons 1 daughter
Ford: 3 sons 1 daughter
Nixon: 2 daughters
Johnson: 2 daughters

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:00 am
by _just me
Shut the “F” up Kevin D. Williamson you sexist asshole.


Welp, that pretty much sums it up, doesn't it?

:evil: :evil: :evil:

Re: Ladies your dads aren't real men because they had girls.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:25 am
by _Quasimodo
Bond James Bond wrote:Last few Presidents:

Obama : 2 daughters
Bush 43: 2 daughters
Clinton: 1 daughter
Bush 41: 4 sons 2 daughters
Reagan : 2 daughters (1 adopted son)
Carter: 3 sons 1 daughter
Ford: 3 sons 1 daughter
Nixon: 2 daughters
Johnson: 2 daughters


Brigham Young (just an estimate... could be many more):

60: 24 sons and 36 daughters. Just my counting from what I could find on a quick web search.

No indication of sexual orientation.