The fact that a convoluted term such as "reverse racism" even exists is an indication of how bizarre a concept it is that an oppressed minority could ever be effectively racist toward the group with all the power. Real racism needs power and authority behind it.
Overlooking for a moment the fact that you provide no reason to believe that what you have stated here is the case, or any rational argument in its support, this claim is itself a major premise existing within black power and multiculturalist ideology; it is a theoretical claim embedded within the general overarching framework of cultural Marxism (and its derivative racialist ideological schools of thought) and not a sociological observation or empirical fact.
Indeed, racism, to be racism, requires only racism; it requires only that an individual hold racist, bigoted views of other people. Krose, like most leftists, sees only groups and collectives, not individual human beings as the actual bearers of human traits and attributes. Hence, the well documented anti-white racism, anti-Semitism, and anti-Asian racism that is disproportionately concentrated among substantial segments of the American black population cannot be "racism," even when they end in an rampaging anti-Semitic riot in which innocent people die, as in the Al Sharpton baited and incited Crown Heights riot in 1991. But power, to any rational, critical thinker, has no necessary connection with racism, or any other kind of prejudice or hatred. The ravening mobs of racist blacks who terrorized and looted Korean neighborhoods during the L.A. riots may have no "power" in the sense of the wielding of official political power in Los Angeles, (although they all have the franchise, and in a fee, democratic Republic,
they do actually hold substantial power, as we all do, to control and channel the political and economic life of their nation and city (which gives the lie to Krose's facile Marxist boilerplate that these people are somehow powerless and without a voice in a free, open, representative democracy)), but they had overwhelming power, in both numbers and the ability to apply power, against those they looted, beat, and murdered.
A Hindu in Utah can hate Mormons all he wants, but there is nothing he can really do about it, since Mormons hold all the positions of power where he lives.
Oh yes, there is:
http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/http://frontpagemag.com/2012/jamie-glaz ... eed-a-lot/http://www.amazon.com/White-Girl-Bleed- ... 0615621635All he has to do is decide to go out and assault, kill, rape, maim, steal, or destroy, against a member of the group he hates. Any target will do, as any target - as is the case for the Left - is not so much an individual as a symbolic representation of the entire group.
It must be agreed that racism is about power, but not political power per se. Power is the ability to act, or to force others to act in a certain way by demand or threat of violence (hard power, in IR terms) All individuals hold this kind of power by virtue of being individuals with agency, motives, beliefs, and the capacity to act upon thought, and racism is nothing more than an individual characteristic, like any other form of bigotry, or like colorblindness, love, humility, patience, or any other psychological attribute as it is found within disparate, individual personalities.
It has no collective features, anymore than does any other individual human characteristic or attribute. The using of political power of in-groups against out-groups can be a concomitant of racism; it may be present when racism is present, and may be used in its name,
but it is not a necessary component of racism. All one needs to be a racist, if one wished to act on his racism, is his fists, a gun, a knife, a case of spraypaint, or a gallon of gasoline and a couple matches.
Krose's opinions here are a textbook example of just the degree to which the Left, wherever it arises and holds cultural dominance, as it does in America and the West, is such a clear and present danger to the very ground and basis of civilization and to humanity itself.