DiscussMormonism.com

I'm sick of you guys coming in here and contributing pleasant topics, introducing thought-provoking interview links, philosophical discussions, etc.!

And so, without further ado:

boobs
dicks
Mitt Romney
asses

gay people
Republicans

Tea Party
communism

black people
latinos

illegal immigrants destroying America

gay marriage

boobies again
damn Liberals

Take that, left-wing fascist so-called intellectuals!

I wanted to get some discussion on abuse vs. coaching in athletics but nobody was interested.

With the exception of me, I can't think of anyone here who opposes illegal immigration and supports enforcing the border.

Freaking islamo-intellectual-libral-homofascists!

Eric, I have no freaking clue what that is, but it's awesome!

Sorry, Seth, I'm all for cleaning up this stinking den of bizarro world ignorance so decent folk don't have to avoid it. Huckleberry referred to this forum as "trolls ville" and he's not the only one that sees it that way.

sethbag ran away...he heee

still cleaning up... whew! hard work!

Take that, left-wing fascist so-called intellectuals!

Huckleberry referred to this forum as "trolls ville" and he's not the only one that sees it that way.

Maybe Huckleberry hasn't been reading this forum, but only the names of the topics? Droopy's and BCSpaces ignorance is only being pushed into the corners by these new posting initiatives. While usually warped and wrong, these two arguably provide entertainment value at the same levels of pictures, and their misunderstandings are not isolated. Many conservatives believe very much like they do, as EA has pointed out. I kind of thought Droopy's rebuttal to KGraham and Analytics that conflated the concept of a loan and an investment was worth the price of admission. Bob L. and Cinepro offer insightful perspectives into what conservative beliefs can be, even if they aren't agreed with by "liberals". MeDotOrg's historical perspectives are informed to the point where I'd be scared to argue with him without doing a lot of research first. EA, well, he is posting here, just seeing his name come up in threads should be reason alone not to "page 2" the whole thing. Beastie and Eric drop in now and again much to the chagrin of Droopy. I'm trying to explain the best I can the differences between market economics and what is often the de facto conservative party line, or show how more extreme conservative ideas usually end up opposing market efficiency concepts, which they often cite as their impetus. I guess if Huck has read all this stuff in addition to the titles of the threads and thinks all of us posting here deserve to go to page two, and he's your leader, then what can I say. But I'd invite y'all to read what the rest of us are saying and point out where we've gone wrong, in addition to also posting threads that you are more interested in. Because our time and effort is now also being pushed into the corners.

thank you for entertaining this political speech.

Gadianton wrote:

Take that, left-wing fascist so-called intellectuals!

Huckleberry referred to this forum as "trolls ville" and he's not the only one that sees it that way.

Maybe Huckleberry hasn't been reading this forum, but only the names of the topics? Droopy's and BCSpaces ignorance is only being pushed into the corners by these new posting initiatives. While usually warped and wrong, these two arguably provide entertainment value at the same levels of pictures, and their misunderstandings are not isolated. Many conservatives believe very much like they do, as EA has pointed out. I kind of thought Droopy's rebuttal to KGraham and Analytics that conflated the concept of a loan and an investment was worth the price of admission. Bob L. and Cinepro offer insightful perspectives into what conservative beliefs can be, even if they aren't agreed with by "liberals". MeDotOrg's historical perspectives are informed to the point where I'd be scared to argue with him without doing a lot of research first. EA, well, he is posting here, just seeing his name come up in threads should be reason alone not to "page 2" the whole thing. Beastie and Eric drop in now and again much to the chagrin of Droopy. I'm trying to explain the best I can the differences between market economics and what is often the de facto conservative party line, or show how more extreme conservative ideas usually end up opposing market efficiency concepts, which they often cite as their impetus. I guess if Huck has read all this stuff in addition to the titles of the threads and thinks all of us posting here deserve to go to page two, and he's your leader, then what can I say. But I'd invite y'all to read what the rest of us are saying and point out where we've gone wrong, in addition to also posting threads that you are more interested in. Because our time and effort is now also being pushed into the corners.

thank you for entertaining this political speech.

LoL Gad. I'm just having some weirdo fun. I could hardly keep up with the steady stream of unintended hilarity anyway. Carry on!