Page 1 of 1
Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:35 pm
by _Droopy
The social sciences at Syricruse University appear to have been substantially compromised, intellectually, well before professor Dyson inaugurated his own version of the following:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/indi ... indid=2244This appears to have been quite popular in the pop Hip-Hop world. Below we see a concentrated mix of Neo-Marxist/Afrocentrist/black power/post-colonial studies fantacism that well represents what I've been reading and observing for the last 25 years.
http://www.africaresource.com/index.php ... Itemid=327
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:28 pm
by _schreech
Dude, we get it already. You are an un(under)employed, white, southern-redneck, tea-bagger who doesn't like black people and doesn't "get" their culture (shocker!!). We understand that you are confused by the civil rights movement (and the reactions to the oppression that preceded it) and that you don't get how it has influenced the US and popular black culture. We get it!
Its obvious that you are upset when you perceive that someone from any minority group is more successful than you. You don't like outspoken, intelligent women (especially when they are LDS). You don't like successful black people who use their culture as a platform for their success. You don't like homosexuals and the fact that they are making political progress in the US. We.get.it...Fortunately, bigots, like yourself, are not getting the mileage out of their rhetoric that they used to get in the 60s and 70s and you are now forced to commiserate with other douchebag racists/homophobes/rednecks on little known "conservative" websites that nobody takes seriously...Unfortunately for you, the world has changed and will continue to change for the better even with dorks like you typing furiously away from your basements about all the problems facing white bigots...like yourself.
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:17 am
by _Droopy
schreech wrote:Dude, we get it already.
No...no, you quite clearly don't.
I snipped your venal, ignorant, intellectually vacant rant for reasons that should be rather obvious.
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:59 am
by _schreech
Droopy wrote:I snipped you[sic] venal, ignorant, intellectually vacant rant for reasons that should be rather obvious.
Because they hit a little to close to home? You realized that you are a raging bigot and you were too embarrassed to actually confront that fact? You actually don't like black people for reasons other than the ones I posted?
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:00 am
by _Droopy
schreech wrote:Droopy wrote:I snipped you[sic] venal, ignorant, intellectually vacant rant for reasons that should be rather obvious.
Because they hit a little to close to home?
No, because you're a raging bigot, and I grow weary of discoursing with you and others of your ilk here.
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:57 pm
by _schreech
schreech wrote: You realized that you are a raging bigot and you were too embarrassed to actually confront that fact?
Droopy wrote:No, because you're a raging bigot.
Lol:
Sheesh, not even clever enough to come up with your own insults....honestly, I love that you attempt to represent the "believing" Mormon mindset online. I can't think of anything that would scare questioning or potential members away from the church faster than reading the barely coherent, racist/homophobic ravings of a loon like you. I applaud your efforts to deter people from joining or remaining active in the LDS church but, unfortunately, intelligent members, like my wife, realize that you are a nutter and she refuses to believe that the LDS church has influenced your closed-minded idiocy. In your case, I have to agree...you would be a loon no matter what religion you associated with.
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:33 pm
by _Droopy
schreech wrote:schreech wrote: You realized that you are a raging bigot and you were too embarrassed to actually confront that fact?
Droopy wrote:No, because you're a raging bigot.
Lol:
Sheesh, not even clever enough to come up with your own insults....honestly, I love that you attempt to represent the "believing" Mormon mindset online. I can't think of anything that would scare questioning or potential members away from the church faster than reading the barely coherent, racist/homophobic ravings of a loon like you. I applaud your efforts to deter people from joining or remaining active in the LDS church but, unfortunately, intelligent members, like my wife, realize that you are a nutter and she refuses to believe that the LDS church has influenced your closed-minded idiocy. In your case, I have to agree...you would be a loon no matter what religion you associated with.
Schreech, you really are one of the most transparent phonies and provocateurs in this forum. Not the slightest trace of intellectual substance or integrity, but a vast quantity of baiting of your hook and lighting Molotov cocktails.
You are now being ignored. Schreech on.
Re: Michael Eric Dyson Wasn't the First
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:37 pm
by _schreech
Droopy wrote: