Hypocrite: Piers Morgan protects home with "Armed Response"

[_bcspace]

Look what's posted on Piers Morgan's lawn - Sting video snags CNN's advocate for grabbing guns

Piers: "Oh, by armed I'm sure they mean truncheon."

[_ldsfaqs]

To be fair to Piers, he does state over and over that he respects gun ownership and doesn't want to take peoples guns away, that simply there should be reasonable "controls".

Of course, to be fair to the actual truth about Piers beliefs contrary to his common liberal lying double-speak, he's directly stated on more than one occasion that he believes all guns should be banned, just like Britain. Britain is his liberal utopia.

So, ultimately you are correct. Piers is a direct hypocrite and deceiver, just like all liberals are.

[_Harold Lee]

I don't think he has a problem with security or government forces being armed with guns. They're designed to protect.

His main concern is senseless shooting sprees, PRIMARILY assault weapons. It's the guy in Wisconsin who shot up a Sikh temple while they were worshipping, or Sandy Hook.

Not sure where I stand on this issue since it's complicated and honestly both sides have extremely valid points.

[_MeDotOrg]

(Piers Morgan) directly stated on more than one occasion that he believes all guns should be banned, just like Britain.

Sources, please?

[_ldsfaqs]

(Piers Morgan) directly stated on more than one occasion that he believes all guns should be banned, just like Britain.

Sources, please?

I don't have time to look it up for you, but I've watched every Pier's Morgan Interview on Youtube, as well as every Gun Control video.

Piers
Feinstein
and most other Democrat's who claim they don't want to take guns away have ALL at some point said just that. Yes, it's been rarely said, and said usually in passing so it's not really noticed, but they've said it.

I've done my own due diligence and study, you do your own.