MeDotOrg wrote:ldsfaqs wrote:There is the bad guys going around terrorizing people with and without guns, and then there are the good people who try to protect themselves, their family, their community from the bad guys
Good people like David Michael Keene, who is currently serving a 10-year sentence for shooting at someone from his BMW in a road rage incident? If only he could have learned about the proper use of firearms from someone in the NRA.
Someone like his father, David Keane, President of the NRA.
So, in your mind because someone has an "immoral" son, the son of a man who only became NRA President two years ago LONG AFTER his sons conviction, and he wasn't really involved with the NRA prior, the son who had a wife who was also immoral imbezzeling $120,000, that that somehow means what??? That the law abiding, the rest of us shouldn't have guns to protect ourselves from people like him for example???
What are you really trying to say here?
Are we to hold Spencer W. Kimball responsible for his anti-mormon grandson?
Your's is a special kind of idiot fallacy.
...and as for New Orleans...
Wake up people! Liberal scientists are now working on ways to create hurricanes in every city in the United States, so that the National Guard (a well-regulated militia) will have the pretext of disarming citizens!
Yeah, that's gonna happen...
1. Well regulated militia was not considered the National Guard back then, it meant something different though similar. The National Guard was created from the idea, not the other way around.
2. Why don't you find something wrong with the actual video, instead of making up crap?
Are you trying to claim that the government did nothing wrong here?
What justification in your mind does the government have to just take ANYONES right to self defense?
And not only that, but doing so in a situation in which the bad guys HAVE been running amok, and the innocent would be much more likely to need their guns, and HAVE needed them?