DiscussMormonism.com

Just a parting shot, as I take a break from the cesspark, as I just saw these items as I was surfing and was just wondering, especially with the most recent item below, when the national mainstream media wall-to-wall coverage will start and when national social networking sites will explode with threats of white race riots:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

http://topconservativenews.com/2013/03/ ... fun-of-it/

http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/five-case ... tional-tv/

Question: Why are these not nationally covered by the mainstream media as "hate crimes," why, given that blacks, as somewhat more than 12% of the population commit 52% of homicides nationally, do these crimes, long on the rise nationally, not spark a "national conservation" on disproportionate social pathology within the black community and its "root causes," and why are Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Eric Holder, Barack Obama, Cornell West, Michael Eric Dyson, Benjamin Chavis, Spike Lee, Samuel L. Jackson et al, et al, not asking those questions?

Thanks Droopy!

Droopy wrote:Just a parting shot, as I take a break from the cesspark, as I just saw these items as I was surfing and was just wondering, especially with the most recent item below, when the national mainstream media wall-to-wall coverage will start and when national social networking sites will explode with threats of white race riots.

It will start as soon as the justice system becomes ambivalent about whether the black man who shot an unarmed white kid committed a crime. It will intensify when the murderer is held up as a hero and the murder victim is blamed because he swore and smoked pot.

Droopy wrote:Question: Why are these not nationally covered by the mainstream media as "hate crimes," why, given that blacks, as somewhat more than 12% of the population commit 52% of homicides nationally...

You need to remember that while blacks are only about 12% of the population, they are about 52% of the murder victims. Highlighting statistics that portray blacks as criminals while ignoring ones that show them as victims makes you look like a racist.

Highlighting statistics that portray blacks as criminals while ignoring ones that show them as victims makes you look like a racist.

The media, Obama administration/DOJ, and the black community at large barely twitch at the thought of all these victims. But if a non black happens to kill a black person, they all shift into high gear. That's racism my friend. Your definition here doesn't even apply to rational reality.

Speaking of "Wonder".....

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/s ... man-585760

Stevie Wonder is "boycotting" Florida and any state or country that has a stand your ground law.
In other words, Stevie Wonder the incredibly ignorant liberal he is believes people should not be allowed to defend themselves even unto death of their attacker, but should instead just allow attackers to beat them unto death.

What is further funny is the complete "lie" they live unto themselves.
Here's what Wonder stated:

"People lost in the battle for justice".....
Why is there no justice for Zimmerman?
Zimmerman was the one attacked and beat up. If Zimmerman hadn't had a gun Trayvon might have killed him. And for what??? Because some guy was watching you from a distance?

Why is "violence" okay to solve possible conflicts for liberals (when they feel like it), but violence to protect your life and body not okay?

"Vote for change and equality".....
Why doesn't Zimmerman deserve change and equality? Simply because he's the one alive??? He was attacked out of the blue simply because HE looked "suspicious" to Trayvon Martin. Why didn't Zimmerman deserve "equal respect"?

"His heart is of love for everyone"......
Complete LIE.... If his heart was of "love", he would love Zimmerman also, have sympathy for a man violently attacked without JUST CAUSE, and that he only used a gun to stop that violent unprovoked attack, an attack that could have easily resulted in the death of Zimmerman, which occurs often.

A man of "love" understands true wrong...., and doesn't blame VICTIMS for the acts of bullies.

"Don't just talk about it (love), got to be about it"......
Again, LIE.... If he was really loving "all", he wouldn't want people to be defensless against superior agresssors. He doesn't love everyone AT ALL!!! He would say that a woman should just LET herself get killed, raped, etc. because "she looks sexy, and that "offends" the rapist or killer". That's the kind of warped logic liberals such as Stevie Wonder holds. Like with Trayvon..... Zimmerman "looked" like an issue, so he just HAS TO ATTACK HIM, teach him a lesson for "looking" that way.

"Comming together for the spirit of unity".....
There is no "unity" in these kinds of statements, "boycotting" people simply because they wish to defend themselves when attacked. I mean, heaven forbid if Zimmerman was actually an "attentive" individual and pulled out his gun and shot the guy as he was coming at him, thus no "evidence" that Martin was about to assult him, even though he clearly was coming at him like he was going to assult Zimmerman. Liberals would have HUNG Zimmerman!!! How is that "right"???

"Not in destruction, but the perpetuation of life itself"......
So, Trayvon had a right to life, to assualt people whenever he wanted (to DESTROY others), but Zimmerman didn't have a right to life, to be free from molestation, harm, "destruction", and even LIFE itself??? One blow could have killed Zimmerman, yet, that FACT is ignored, and Trayvon is "innocent". Sick sick sick the liberal mindset of presserving life over what is RIGHT, and the true "preservation of life".

In conclusion.... Step by step, one sees the "perversion" of good and right, the warping of good words and good ideas from common sense and character, using them in ways they are not intended perverting their value, the calling of good evil and evil good. This is the liberal mind, the perversion that it is.

ldsfaqs wrote:Stevie Wonder is "boycotting" Florida and any state or country that has a stand your ground law.
In other words, Stevie Wonder the incredibly ignorant liberal he is believes people should not be allowed to defend themselves even unto death of their attacker, but should instead just allow attackers to beat them unto death.

So ldsfaqs, before Stand Your Ground laws, people weren't allowed to defend themselves, and just had to allow their attackers to beat them to death?

The irony is so thick in here I can't breath.

Analytics wrote:

Droopy wrote:Question: Why are these not nationally covered by the mainstream media as "hate crimes," why, given that blacks, as somewhat more than 12% of the population commit 52% of homicides nationally...

You need to remember that while blacks are only about 12% of the population, they are about 52% of the murder victims. Highlighting statistics that portray blacks as criminals while ignoring ones that show them as victims makes you look like a racist.

Your statistics are a bit faulty. Blacks comprise 94% of murder victims when the assailant is black, and 46% of murder victims nationally.

And, for the record, I've never ignored any of this, and have, indeed, over the years, mentioned these statistics numerous times in numerous debates and discussions.

MeDotOrg wrote:

ldsfaqs wrote:Stevie Wonder is "boycotting" Florida and any state or country that has a stand your ground law.
In other words, Stevie Wonder the incredibly ignorant liberal he is believes people should not be allowed to defend themselves even unto death of their attacker, but should instead just allow attackers to beat them unto death.

So ldsfaqs, before Stand Your Ground laws, people weren't allowed to defend themselves, and just had to allow their attackers to beat them to death?

No..... Stand your ground laws were put into place because LIBERALS were convicting people of crimes when there was no criminal intent, and people were "reasonably" having fear of being attacked, harmed, or killed.

In other words, if some man comes at you in a threatening manner as if he's about to assault you, you have a right to defend yourself even with deadly force in the same way police have the right to do the same. As well, if you are being attacked, you have a right to use deadly force because of reasonable fear of serious harm or death.

Thus, people were being put in jail for simply defending themselves from violent assault. Stand your ground laws help stop that CRIME.

There is no "moral" obligation to be assaulted or to "see" how violent an assault is, as long as there are reasonable indicator's of violent intent and/or actions.

It's not that complicated, it's common sense. If liberals hadn't tried to make the issue about race, and claiming Trayvon was an innocent child, nobody would have cared the incident happened. The liberals with "race" on the brain made this event an issue.

The guy was being assaulted, doesn't matter who, what, when, where, and why.... He had a right to defend his person from assault and even death.

I just watched a video of an off duty cop wrongly assaulting a civilian with ONLY ONE PUNCH putting the guy into a COMA. Did you people notice Zimmerman's nose? A punch at the correct angle and force, and Zimmermans nose bone could have been punched into his brain killing him.

I just drives me nut's that people who know nothing about violence, pain, guns, etc. JUDGE falsely and wickedly. You ever been punched in the face? You ever been beat down by a group? You ever been bullied? You ever comforted someone, and cried with them for whatever pain they go through because of someone else? Friggen ignorant and unfeeling! :(