DiscussMormonism.com

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... rdict.html

Though, I don't agree at all with him that there was "racial" profiling.
Yes, there was profiling, but that's what anyone does who's a protector. We profile "behavior".
Zimmerman would have followed the guy if it was a "white guy" in a hoody, a wanna-be white gangsta.
Thus, to make it "race" is simply false and falling for the liberal media spin machine.

Further, he say's he watched the trial. But, he must not have watched much of it, because there was ZERO indication of race or racial profiling presented as evidence. Not only that, but many witnesses were presented to show that Zimmerman wasn't racist, zero presented that he was.

Race being involved is liberal "fantasy" belief, just as all liberal beliefs are.

The Prosecution in this case clearly overcharged Zimmerman.
The Jury of the Zimmerman trial came out with the right and correct verdict according to the letter of the law.
It is now time to just leave Zimmerman alone.

State never proved its case, legal analysts say

Zimmerman verdict no surprise to many lawyers

Why was Zimmerman overcharged? Column

Charles Barkley is one of those guys who just says whatever he thinks, no matter if it's popular or not. That's why we love him as a basketball analyst. I never get the impression he says things just to get attention. When he talks, it seems to be what he genuinely believes, and doesn't give a crap what others think. He's a beloved figure among African-Americans, and he probably disappointed most of them, but he is simply incapable of censoring himself to satisfy an audience.

Brackite wrote:The Prosecution in this case clearly overcharged Zimmerman.
The Jury of the Zimmerman trial came out with the right and correct verdict according to the letter of the law.

Being "overcharged" doesn't mean anything. Prosecutors do it all the time, and people end up being convicted for a lesser charge.

Also, the state didn't prove it's case because it never had one in the first place. It's entirely why Zimmerman was released instead of charged initially. It was nothing more than a show trial by a corrupt prosecutor to satisfy liberal race mongers. It used every fact and belief it could claim racism caused Zimmerman to shoot Trayvon, but the facts were contrary to the belief, and so Zimmerman was acquitted.

Being "overcharged" doesn't mean anything. Prosecutors do it all the time, and people end up being convicted for a lesser charge.

Prosecutors do Not "do it all the time."
For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conrad_Murray

Brackite wrote:

Being "overcharged" doesn't mean anything. Prosecutors do it all the time, and people end up being convicted for a lesser charge.

Prosecutors do Not "do it all the time."
For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conrad_Murray

Why don't you ask a prosecutor and learn something.

Further, what the heck are you trying to claim by that case?
I said it occurs all the time, I didn't say it is DONE every time. Do you not understand English?

Yes, they also often charge only up to what they think they can get.
They do both. In other words, it's a "common" thing, which is what I said, so why are you being an offender for a word?

ldsfaqs wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/07/18/charles_barkley_on_zimmerman_trial_i_agree_with_the_verdict.html

Though, I don't agree at all with him that there was "racial" profiling.
Yes, there was profiling...

So, even though you don't agree that there was racial profiling you agree that there was racial profiling....are you Mitt Romney in real life?

Bazooka wrote:

ldsfaqs wrote:Though, I don't agree at all with him that there was "racial" profiling.
Yes, there was profiling...

So, even though you don't agree that there was racial profiling you agree that there was racial profiling....are you Mitt Romney in real life?

Wow.... You people never cease to show how utterly lacking in basic intelligence you are, demonstrating exactly what we say about you. You see only what you want to see, and you then insert fantasy into it.

Worse, is I even clarified the statement, and yet you still saw only your fantasy lies instead of truth and fact.

Why don't you read what I said again, carefully this time.

-----

Let me help your disabled brain..... because I feel sorry for you.
Read what I wrote again, and please tell us how your liberal brain translates "profiling behavior" as being the same thing as "profiling race"?

Even more, I not only explained my statement, but I gave an EXAMPLE of it, that it could have been a white guy in a hoodie and Zimmerman would have done the same exact thing.

So, what does "race" have to do with it? Please tell us the great liberal brain skills.

Um, every teenager I know wears a hoodie and owns several. Hoodies are all they wear. They don't wear coats. Just hoodies. Hoodie does not a gangster make.

ldsfaqs wrote:Why don't you ask a prosecutor and learn something.

Further, what the heck are you trying to claim by that case?
I said it occurs all the time, I didn't say it is DONE every time. Do you not understand English?

Yes, they also often charge only up to what they think they can get.
They do both. In other words, it's a "common" thing, which is what I said, so why are you being an offender for a word?

Do you not understand English?

viewtopic.php?p=419309#p419309

viewtopic.php?p=419475#p419475

viewtopic.php?p=702877#p702877

viewtopic.php?p=702943#p702943