Assault Rifles: Necessary For Citizen Use - Examples

[_bcspace]

When has an "assault rifle" been used in self-defense, rebuttal to Bob Costas

[_ludwigm]

When has an "assault rifle" been used in self-defense

Every time somebody wants to validate his basic rights to shoot a dozen.

.

by the way I didn't watch the 13 minute video - and never will. My time is more worthy.
The same size text can be read in one minute. For those who can read.


Next time there will be bcspaces who show just cause for using intercontinental rockets. As self-defense.

Phew...

[_subgenius]

...(snip)...My time is more worthy...(snip)...

...than to be wasted on learning facts

Before the Civil War ended, State “Slave Codes” prohibited slaves from owning guns. After President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and after the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishing slavery was adopted and the Civil War ended in 1865, States persisted in prohibiting blacks, now freemen, from owning guns under laws renamed “Black Codes.” They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites. This view was specifically articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in its infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford to uphold slavery.

The Colorado Democratic Party, as represented by State Rep. Joe Salazar, has said openly that women are too mentally unstable to handle firearms responsibly.
(Democrats - enabling rapists in Colorado)
but don't worry
The University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, meanwhile, offered the following non-firearm defense tip for rape: "Vomiting or urinating may also convince the attacker to leave you alone."

Yep...vomiting or urinating...as effective as any gun in Colorado

Thanks to opinions and efficient time management strategies, people like Ludwigm are perpetuating the stupidity of this world.

[_ldsfaqs]

Indeed, liberals are sad fascinating creatures....

They so much believe they are about the "facts" and "science" etc. etc. that they have no clue that they aren't even close to all the actual facts and all the science which tells the actual and full truth, which is contrary to their "fantasy" beliefs.

"Assault" weapons have been used many times, and well over 10 rounds also for whatever gun in just America alone for self defense. Not only that, but what about when evil try's to kill and take away freedom, assault weapons have again protected and prevented or at least slowed that evil. Yet, when people haven't had weapons or assault weapons, what has happened, evil controls and murders in mass.

Weapons control in all of human history has done nothing for safety, but instead done the exact opposite, allowed evil to control, harm and murder in mass. Liberal evil is nothing new, in the past it was "swords", or any sort of weapon. Japan had whole Martial Art systems develop using common "farming tools" because of their "bans" on weapons and swords.

Liberalism is nothing but based in evil and perversion of truth and right. If liberals truly believe they are on the side of right and want to be, they need to really think and study more because they most certainly are not on the side of truth and right.