ajax18 wrote:Just looking at the way the landowning farmer lived when I used to teach Mexicans English, it was hard for me to believe that his business didn't earn enough money to pay them more. Same for the construction contractor framing and hanging drywall on a building. The man was grossing over $300k/year but said he couldn't afford to pay for legal labor. Are you saying I'd be wrong in that assumption EAllusion?
Going to jump in here and I may regret it. BUT... it is said that the two forces that drive the American Stock Market, (and by extension, the American Economy), are FEAR and GREED. Fear is supposed to keep you from making really dumb mistakes, which you inevitably do, and Greed keeps you coming back after your dumb mistakes.
So in your example the contractor grossing over $300K/year is being driven by greed. He wants it all, and by damn he is well on his way to having it. He is feeding his rampant greed on the backs of the underpaid cheap labor, regardless of where he finds it.
It just makes sense then that a 'fair' society would force the contractor to live on less, and pay his workers more. It's just the right thing to do. But once you legislate that one of two things will happen. Either, 1), His income will be lessened and he will see the gold-ring of limitless riches being jerked away and will decide to stop reaching for it. (You will have killed his greed, by playing to his fears). Which if he does, will mean NO work for the group you're trying to help. OR, 2), He, and all others like him will raise their prices to compensate for the loss of profits, which will engender a rapid inflation throughout the economy. This kind of run-away inflation hurts all workers, and really hurts those at the bottom of the income ladder, who are the very group you're trying to help.
A friendship that requires agreement in all things, is not worthy of the term friendship.