Rules and Moderator information

[canpakes]

I don’t see a PM from you, cc’ing Shades, that requests his permission. I’ll wait until you have completed that step, as asked previously. Thanks!

You have my permission. You need to ask Dr.Shades if you can post your own PM, that's not my responsibility, it's yours. Good try though!

I can’t help you if you refuse to follow the simple request to obtain Shades’ permission. Doing so would be showing a basic respect for his rules and the board. You’ve always fought that, strangely.

[Hound of Heaven]

You have my permission. You need to ask Dr.Shades if you can post your own PM, that's not my responsibility, it's yours. Good try though!

I can’t help you if you refuse to follow the simple request to obtain Shades’ permission. Doing so would be showing a basic respect for his rules and the board. You’ve always fought that, strangely.

I just posted on the AI thread what Gemini AI thought about your PM. Gemini also said your response was unpleasant.

[Hound of Heaven]

You have my permission. You need to ask Dr.Shades if you can post your own PM, that's not my responsibility, it's yours. Good try though!

I can’t help you if you refuse to follow the simple request to obtain Shades’ permission. Doing so would be showing a basic respect for his rules and the board. You’ve always fought that, strangely.

I just posted what Grok thought about your PM. So far 3 AI platforms find your PM to be more unpleasant than pleasant.

[canpakes]

I can’t help you if you refuse to follow the simple request to obtain Shades’ permission. Doing so would be showing a basic respect for his rules and the board. You’ve always fought that, strangely.

I just posted what Grok thought about your PM. So far 3 AI platforms find your PM to be more unpleasant than pleasant.

Did you try Clyde? It thinks that I’m kind and generous, and can draw really well.

[Hound of Heaven]

Dr. Shades, No need to reply unless you feel inclined. I'm simply sharing this post to inform you of my current status regarding the training of the Marxist progressives on your discussion board.

First, before I provide my update, I want to highlight that when I logged in this morning, I noticed on one of my threads that yesterday and overnight, Can'tpakes the moderator diverted the discussion by posting for hours about an off-topic subject, resulting in 3 pages of posts that were unrelated to the thread topic, and Can'tpakes never redirected the conversation to spirit prison. I want to highlight this to illustrate the inconsistency exhibited by your moderator. If I had invested hours in a thread, accumulating three pages of off-topic posts, it’s well understood that Can'tpakes would relocate my post to spirit prison, followed by a message in red lettering cautioning me against derailing a thread in spirit paradise. There's no need to be concerned about moving Can'tpakes off my thread; I prefer it to remain there so that everyone can witness the hypocrisy Can'tpakes engages in while posting on the board!

Let's return to the main subject! Dr. Shades, I’m not seeking a thank you, but I would like to highlight the success of my training sessions on the board over the past 6 months. Observing Can'tpakes' recent actions in comparison to those from six months ago, along with the behavior and statements of DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo, it becomes evident that I have effectively guided these three individuals on appropriate conduct for posting on your discussion board. Six months ago, DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo were using profanity, sharing crude images, engaging in inappropriate conversations, and referring to board members with offensive names. Through my determination and strong resolve, I have successfully guided these two individuals to become better board members. They are now demonstrating greater maturity and are able to contribute without reacting negatively with every post. The evidence supporting my statement is found in their post if you doubt me! Observe the difference in their posting style now versus six months ago.

Regarding Can'tpakes, your top moderator, I am pleased to share that he has notably enhanced his conduct since I consistently highlighted the discrepancies in how he treated certain board members compared to his friends on the board. I would like to express my gratitude for permitting me to utilize this thread to educate those who use your board as a platform to promote their Marxist agenda among fellow members. If I cannot communicate with you directly in this thread, I will struggle to effectively train the misfits on your board.

The final question remains: now that I've openly criticized Can'tpakes, will he become so upset that he will retaliate by moving this post to spirit prison for highlighting the truth? Thank you once more, Dr. Shades, for permitting me to utilize this thread! Once more, there's no need to reply, as it's clear that doing so would create an uncomfortable situation with Can'tpakes. I would kindly recommend giving him some time to calm down after reading this post, as he may feel upset for several days, contemplating how to move this post to spirit prison due to its truthful content.

[canpakes]

The final question remains: now that I've openly criticized Can'tpakes, will he become so upset that he will retaliate by moving this post to spirit prison for highlighting the truth?

Hound, that thread is an excellent demonstration of board activity that you claim to be wanting to abolish, after your opening post repeatedly name-called 9 other board members out of the blue, with your attempt at insults then followed by another board member suffering a breakdown of sorts and trying to see how many ways he could work several pejoratives into fun new word forms.

Per your specific request in that thread: I’ll leave the conversation intact, but I’ll likely need to edit-in-place a few words that aren’t appropriate for this sub.

[Whiskey]

The final question remains: now that I've openly criticized Can'tpakes, will he become so upset that he will retaliate by moving this post to spirit prison for highlighting the truth?

Hound, that thread is an excellent demonstration of board activity that you claim to be wanting to abolish, after your opening post repeatedly name-called 9 other board members out of the blue, with your attempt at insults then followed by another board member suffering a breakdown of sorts and trying to see how many ways he could work several pejoratives into fun new word forms.

Per your specific request in that thread -I’ll leave the conversation intact, but I’ll likely need to edit-in-place a few words that aren’t appropriate for this sub.

What damned words are not appropriate, panny?

[Marcus]

Dr. Shades, No need to reply unless you feel inclined. I'm simply sharing this post to inform you of my current status regarding the training of the Marxist progressives on your discussion board.

First, before I provide my update, I want to highlight that when I logged in this morning, I noticed on one of my threads that yesterday and overnight, Can'tpakes the moderator diverted the discussion by posting for hours about an off-topic subject, resulting in 3 pages of posts that were unrelated to the thread topic, and Can'tpakes never redirected the conversation to spirit prison. I want to highlight this to illustrate the inconsistency exhibited by your moderator. If I had invested hours in a thread, accumulating three pages of off-topic posts, it’s well understood that Can'tpakes would relocate my post to spirit prison, followed by a message in red lettering cautioning me against derailing a thread in spirit paradise. There's no need to be concerned about moving Can'tpakes off my thread; I prefer it to remain there so that everyone can witness the hypocrisy Can'tpakes engages in while posting on the board!

Let's return to the main subject! Dr. Shades, I’m not seeking a thank you, but I would like to highlight the success of my training sessions on the board over the past 6 months. Observing Can'tpakes' recent actions in comparison to those from six months ago, along with the behavior and statements of DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo, it becomes evident that I have effectively guided these three individuals on appropriate conduct for posting on your discussion board. Six months ago, DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo were using profanity, sharing crude images, engaging in inappropriate conversations, and referring to board members with offensive names. Through my determination and strong resolve, I have successfully guided these two individuals to become better board members. They are now demonstrating greater maturity and are able to contribute without reacting negatively with every post. The evidence supporting my statement is found in their post if you doubt me! Observe the difference in their posting style now versus six months ago.

Regarding Can'tpakes, your top moderator, I am pleased to share that he has notably enhanced his conduct since I consistently highlighted the discrepancies in how he treated certain board members compared to his friends on the board. I would like to express my gratitude for permitting me to utilize this thread to educate those who use your board as a platform to promote their Marxist agenda among fellow members. If I cannot communicate with you directly in this thread, I will struggle to effectively train the misfits on your board.

The final question remains: now that I've openly criticized Can'tpakes, will he become so upset that he will retaliate by moving this post to spirit prison for highlighting the truth? Thank you once more, Dr. Shades, for permitting me to utilize this thread! Once more, there's no need to reply, as it's clear that doing so would create an uncomfortable situation with Can'tpakes. I would kindly recommend giving him some time to calm down after reading this post, as he may feel upset for several days, contemplating how to move this post to spirit prison due to its truthful content.

Lol. Before binger deletes this, I thought it would be interesting to preserve a view of his small world that literally no one else has. On another note, I suppose it's better that binger's mental illness express itself here, rather than in real life settings. At least, we can only hope this is the case.

[canpakes]

Dr. Shades, No need to reply unless you feel inclined. I'm simply sharing this post to inform you of my current status regarding the training of the Marxist progressives on your discussion board.

First, before I provide my update, I want to highlight that when I logged in this morning, I noticed on one of my threads that yesterday and overnight, Can'tpakes the moderator diverted the discussion by posting for hours about an off-topic subject, resulting in 3 pages of posts that were unrelated to the thread topic, and Can'tpakes never redirected the conversation to spirit prison. I want to highlight this to illustrate the inconsistency exhibited by your moderator. If I had invested hours in a thread, accumulating three pages of off-topic posts, it’s well understood that Can'tpakes would relocate my post to spirit prison, followed by a message in red lettering cautioning me against derailing a thread in spirit paradise. There's no need to be concerned about moving Can'tpakes off my thread; I prefer it to remain there so that everyone can witness the hypocrisy Can'tpakes engages in while posting on the board!

Let's return to the main subject! Dr. Shades, I’m not seeking a thank you, but I would like to highlight the success of my training sessions on the board over the past 6 months. Observing Can'tpakes' recent actions in comparison to those from six months ago, along with the behavior and statements of DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo, it becomes evident that I have effectively guided these three individuals on appropriate conduct for posting on your discussion board. Six months ago, DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo were using profanity, sharing crude images, engaging in inappropriate conversations, and referring to board members with offensive names. Through my determination and strong resolve, I have successfully guided these two individuals to become better board members. They are now demonstrating greater maturity and are able to contribute without reacting negatively with every post. The evidence supporting my statement is found in their post if you doubt me! Observe the difference in their posting style now versus six months ago.

Regarding Can'tpakes, your top moderator, I am pleased to share that he has notably enhanced his conduct since I consistently highlighted the discrepancies in how he treated certain board members compared to his friends on the board. I would like to express my gratitude for permitting me to utilize this thread to educate those who use your board as a platform to promote their Marxist agenda among fellow members. If I cannot communicate with you directly in this thread, I will struggle to effectively train the misfits on your board.

The final question remains: now that I've openly criticized Can'tpakes, will he become so upset that he will retaliate by moving this post to spirit prison for highlighting the truth? Thank you once more, Dr. Shades, for permitting me to utilize this thread! Once more, there's no need to reply, as it's clear that doing so would create an uncomfortable situation with Can'tpakes. I would kindly recommend giving him some time to calm down after reading this post, as he may feel upset for several days, contemplating how to move this post to spirit prison due to its truthful content.

Lol. Before binger deletes this, I thought it would be interesting to preserve a view of his small world that literally no one else has. On another note, I suppose it's better that binger's mental illness express itself here, rather than in real life settings. At least, we can only hope this is the case.

Lessons from the Hound account’s post:

Everyone is on such excellent behavior, with two exceptions:

1. Hound of Heaven cannot manage to post anything without namecalling up to 10 random people per post or calling all members of the board ‘Marxist Progressives’,

2. Binger/Whiskey has taken up the profanity slack for all other users, needing to drop f-bombs and other pejoratives every third word or so.

As predicted - and as witnessed through board history - the two loudest complainers have always been the two worst offenders.

[Whiskey]

Lol. Before binger deletes this, I thought it would be interesting to preserve a view of his small world that literally no one else has. On another note, I suppose it's better that binger's mental illness express itself here, rather than in real life settings. At least, we can only hope this is the case.

Lessons from the Hound account’s post:

Everyone is on such excellent behavior, with two exceptions:

1. Hound of Heaven cannot manage to post anything without namecalling up to 10 random people per post or calling all members of the board ‘Marxist Progressives’,

2. Binger/Whiskey has taken up the profanity slack for all other users, needing to drop f-bombs and other pejoratives every third word or so.

As predicted - and as witnessed through board history - the two loudest complainers have always been the two worst offenders.

What the “F”, panny? You talking about me?