Page 1 of 4

Royals Win!

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 11:57 pm
by _Ceeboo
Royals Win!

Royals Win!

Royals Win!


:smile:

Peace,
Ceeboo

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:59 am
by _MeDotOrg
The Cubs win, and Playboy ceases publication of fully nude centerfolds.

Forget about Revelations, these are the true signs of the Apocalypse.

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:32 am
by _Dr. Shades
You're only joking about that Playboy thing, right?

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 10:16 pm
by _Brackite

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:25 am
by _MeDotOrg
Dr. Shades wrote:You're only joking about that Playboy thing, right?


I kid you not, Dr. Shades:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/13/business/media/nudes-are-old-news-at-playboy.html

But I just realized something while I was reading your comment:

A lot of men that grew up with the internet and cable television probably don't realize the importance of Playboy in American culture. Among young adolescent suburban males growing up, Playboy was one of the few things to which we had access that showed boobs.

Boobs were very important to me, as they were and are to many adolescent males.

And yes, I confess I read some of the interviews, articles and short stories, which elevated areas of my consciousness north of my belt buckle.

But the idea of Playboy without boobs is like Mormon Discussions without ldsfaqs: One would be an arid intellectual desert which no one would want to visit, and the other would be boob free. I'll leave it to the gentle reader to decide which is which.

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:48 am
by _ludwigm
MeDotOrg wrote:Boobs were very important to me
As are to me. Please don't forget; I am 70.

MeDotOrg wrote:And yes, I confess I read some of the interviews, articles and short stories, which elevated areas of my consciousness north of my belt buckle.
Please don't obfuscate... it is about Your dick.

MeDotOrg wrote:But the idea of Playboy without boobs is like Mormon Discussions without ldsfaqs
Worth of sig line.

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 3:43 pm
by _Ceeboo
MeDotOrg wrote:
But the idea of Playboy without boobs is like Mormon Discussions without ldsfaqs:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Peace,
Ceeboo

Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:40 pm
by _Quasimodo
MeDotOrg wrote:The Cubs win, and Playboy ceases publication of fully nude centerfolds.

Forget about Revelations, these are the true signs of the Apocalypse.


I hope it's not the Apocalypse. I do think it's a sign from God that print media in general is in serious trouble.

Maybe it's a good thing. It's going to save a lot of trees.

Re: Cubs Win!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:59 pm
by _CameronMO
This is the stupidest thread ever. I can't believe I even liked you, Ceeboo.

Sincerely,
Cardinals Fan

Re: Cubs Win!

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 5:45 pm
by _Ceeboo
Hey CameronMO! :smile:

CameronMO wrote:This is the stupidest thread ever. I can't believe I even liked you, Ceeboo.

Sincerely,
Cardinals Fan


:lol: :lol:

Thanks for the smile, friend.

Yeah - I'm not really a Cubs fan. I just thought it was cool because they are NEVER playing post-season ball.

I am a HUGE MLB fan (Love my Tigers) and I think playoff baseball is AWESOME!!!!!

by the way - Not sure if you're a MLB fan or not but did you watch the 7th inning of the Toronto/Texas game? In my mind, it was one of the most bizarre, unforgettable, emotional, and fantastically entertaining inning I have ever seen - period.

Peace,
Ceeboo