BBC removes radio host after mocks 'global warming'.....

[_ldsfaqs]

[I study the science. It's guys like you that try and turn science into political "sides."

LOL, you only prove the point....
Science can be manipulated to "seem" like something it's not, which is exactly what your people have been doing.
The "truth" is not "sides"..... it's simply the truth. The whole truth and facts entirely debunk man made global warming.

I'm all for improving life and tech in constructive ways for a better cleaner life, but I'm not for lying and manipulation.
Again, if man made global warming was real, I would be all for stopping it. But it's not, it's an elaborate con job.
I've spent my life studying good and evil, right and wrong, truth from falsehood, and con jobs compared with fact.

9/11 nutjobs claim to be "all about the science" also.... but they aren't. Neither are you.
It's careful manipulation of the data, and careful presentation to promote an agenda, that of liberalism's utopia environmental dreams.
Sure, not everyone's doing that, they are just like you "trusting" the top people, trusting they are properly presenting things. But they aren't.

[_Res Ipsa]

[I study the science. It's guys like you that try and turn science into political "sides."

LOL, you only prove the point....
Science can be manipulated to "seem" like something it's not, which is exactly what your people have been doing.
The "truth" is not "sides"..... it's simply the truth. The whole truth and facts entirely debunk man made global warming.

I'm all for improving life and tech in constructive ways for a better cleaner life, but I'm not for lying and manipulation.
Again, if man made global warming was real, I would be all for stopping it. But it's not, it's an elaborate con job.
I've spent my life studying good and evil, right and wrong, truth from falsehood, and con jobs compared with fact.

9/11 nutjobs claim to be "all about the science" also.... but they aren't. Neither are you.
It's careful manipulation of the data, and careful presentation to promote an agenda, that of liberalism's utopia environmental dreams.
Sure, not everyone's doing that, they are just like you "trusting" the top people, trusting they are properly presenting things. But they aren't.

Well, let's test which one of us is following the science and which of us is a 911 truther.

All other things being equal, what does science say happens when we add CO2 to the atmosphere?

[_ldsfaqs]

Well, let's test which one of us is following the science and which of us is a 911 truther.

All other things being equal, what does science say happens when we add CO2 to the atmosphere?

If you actually studied the history of Co2 and Warming of the entire earths history, you would know that most of the earths history including COLD, Warm, and just right wonderful highly vegetative conditions of tempurature and life has had Co2 levels between 1,000-4,000 PPM of Co2.

Yet you morons actually think it's the end of the world that if it goes just a little higher than our current level of 400 PPM which is extremely low compared to 95% whatever percent of the earths recordable Co2 and Temp levels, let alone the fact that it's only risen some 50 points whatever in the last 50 years, and expected to do basically the same in the next 50 years. You'll note we are FAR from Co2 levels that the earth has been happy about.

Further, science says Co2 FOLLOWS warming, not the other way around as claimed. That is one of those carefully crafted lies by your "scientists".

Do you remember me posting that post about that liberal climate professor who was all in with AGW, then realized when he looked closer at the data etc. WTF..... that the scientists had been lying, misrepresenting and overblowing the problem, then changed his mind that there is no actual man-made global warming, or if there is..... it's not even close to being some sort of "catastrophe"? You don't get it..... You're just "believing" the final product claims.

Anyway, let's reduce pollution instead of lying to do it.

[_Res Ipsa]

Well, let's test which one of us is following the science and which of us is a 911 truther.

All other things being equal, what does science say happens when we add CO2 to the atmosphere?

If you actually studied the history of Co2 and Warming of the entire earths history, you would know that most of the earths history including COLD, Warm, and just right wonderful highly vegetative conditions of tempurature and life has had Co2 levels between 1,000-4,000 PPM of Co2.

Yet you morons actually think it's the end of the world that if it goes just a little higher than our current level of 400 PPM which is extremely low compared to 95% whatever percent of the earths recordable Co2 and Temp levels, let alone the fact that it's only risen some 50 points whatever in the last 50 years, and expected to do basically the same in the next 50 years. You'll note we are FAR from Co2 levels that the earth has been happy about.

Further, science says Co2 FOLLOWS warming, not the other way around as claimed. That is one of those carefully crafted lies by your "scientists".

Do you remember me posting that post about that liberal climate professor who was all in with AGW, then realized when he looked closer at the data etc. WTF..... that the scientists had been lying, misrepresenting and overblowing the problem, then changed his mind that there is no actual man-made global warming, or if there is..... it's not even close to being some sort of "catastrophe"? You don't get it..... You're just "believing" the final product claims.

Anyway, let's reduce pollution instead of lying to do it.

Answer the question, faqs. It's a straight up scientific question.

[_ludwigm]

Answer the question, faqs. It's a straight up scientific question.

Not much of science is taught on youtube. If there are some, they go under the flood of garbage.

I cannot for the life of me understand why, while people without driver's licenses are not allowed on public roads, in bookstores one can find any number of books by persons without decency – let alone knowledge. The inflation of the printed word has been caused, no doubt, by the exponential increase in the number of those writing, but in equal degree by editorial policies. In the childhood of our civilization only select, well-educated individuals were able to read and write, and much the same criterion held after the invention of printing; and even if the works of imbeciles were published (which, I suppose, is impossible to avoid completely), their total number was not astronomical, as it is today. Today, in the flood of garbage, valuable publications must go under, because it is easier to find one worthwhile book among ten worthless than a thousand among a million. Moreover, the phenomenon of pseudo plagiarism becomes inevitable – the unintentional repetition of the ideas of others who are unknown.

(His Master's Voice by Stanislaw Lem)

[_Res Ipsa]

Gonna have to read me some more Lem.

[_I have a question]

Given that the article in the OP is authored by the guy who is also the subject of the article, is there a chance we aren't seeing a balanced viewpoint of what actually happened?

[_The CCC]

Well, let's test which one of us is following the science and which of us is a 911 truther.

All other things being equal, what does science say happens when we add CO2 to the atmosphere?

If you actually studied the history of Co2 and Warming of the entire earths history, you would know that most of the earths history including COLD, Warm, and just right wonderful highly vegetative conditions of tempurature and life has had Co2 levels between 1,000-4,000 PPM of Co2.

Yet you morons actually think it's the end of the world that if it goes just a little higher than our current level of 400 PPM which is extremely low compared to 95% whatever percent of the earths recordable Co2 and Temp levels, let alone the fact that it's only risen some 50 points whatever in the last 50 years, and expected to do basically the same in the next 50 years. You'll note we are FAR from Co2 levels that the earth has been happy about.

Further, science says Co2 FOLLOWS warming, not the other way around as claimed. That is one of those carefully crafted lies by your "scientists".

Do you remember me posting that post about that liberal climate professor who was all in with AGW, then realized when he looked closer at the data etc. WTF..... that the scientists had been lying, misrepresenting and overblowing the problem, then changed his mind that there is no actual man-made global warming, or if there is..... it's not even close to being some sort of "catastrophe"? You don't get it..... You're just "believing" the final product claims.

Anyway, let's reduce pollution instead of lying to do it.

The last time CO2c levels were this high people didn't exist.

[_ldsfaqs]

If you actually studied the history of Co2 and Warming of the entire earths history, you would know that most of the earths history including COLD, Warm, and just right wonderful highly vegetative conditions of tempurature and life has had Co2 levels between 1,000-4,000 PPM of Co2.

Yet you morons actually think it's the end of the world that if it goes just a little higher than our current level of 400 PPM which is extremely low compared to 95% whatever percent of the earths recordable Co2 and Temp levels, let alone the fact that it's only risen some 50 points whatever in the last 50 years, and expected to do basically the same in the next 50 years. You'll note we are FAR from Co2 levels that the earth has been happy about.

Further, science says Co2 FOLLOWS warming, not the other way around as claimed. That is one of those carefully crafted lies by your "scientists".

Do you remember me posting that post about that liberal climate professor who was all in with AGW, then realized when he looked closer at the data etc. WTF..... that the scientists had been lying, misrepresenting and overblowing the problem, then changed his mind that there is no actual man-made global warming, or if there is..... it's not even close to being some sort of "catastrophe"? You don't get it..... You're just "believing" the final product claims.

Anyway, let's reduce pollution instead of lying to do it.

The last time CO2c levels were this high people didn't exist.

And....? Animals did and still do. Plants did also.....
In other words, all the necessity's to support human life existed..... So, that debunks your claim.

[_Lemmie]

I'm not seeing that this:

And....? Animals did and still do. Plants did also.....
In other words, all the necessity's to support human life existed.....

In any way at all is even related to this:

So, that debunks your claim.

You still haven't answered Brad's question, faqs. And it's STILL just a straight up scientific question.