BBC removes radio host after mocks 'global warming'.....

[_The CCC]

LDSFAQ:

Irrelevant. Plants and animals were here long before humans, and will be here long after we've gone the way of the dinosaurs.

[_ldsfaqs]

LDSFAQ:

Irrelevant. Plants and animals were here long before humans, and will be here long after we've gone the way of the dinosaurs.

Not "irrelvant"..... Animals consume oxygen exactly the SAME as man (most).... thus if THEY survive and thrive, then so can man.
You people really don't think about what you're even saying.

My point is, 1000-4000 PPM through the earths history well supported LIFE just fine, thus human life can survive just fine when Co2 goes above it's current 400PPM which is utterly LOW compared to the earths history.

[_Lemmie]

LDSFAQ:

Irrelevant. Plants and animals were here long before humans, and will be here long after we've gone the way of the dinosaurs.

Not "irrelvant"..... Animals consume oxygen exactly the SAME as man (most).... thus if THEY survive and thrive, then so can man.
You people really don't think about what you're even saying.

My point is, 1000-4000 PPM through the earths history well supported LIFE just fine, thus human life can survive just fine when Co2 goes above it's current 400PPM which is utterly LOW compared to the earths history.

OMG, déjà vu all over again.

- Most of the earths history has been between 1,000-4,000 PPM Co2 levels.
- During that history we've had warm periods, cold periods, moderate periods, and the earth and people have been just fine hunky dory.

Not hunky dory. Life as we see today would not be possible under many of these conditions of the past.

Not only that but most Warming periods when they did occur preceeded Co2 level rises.

Have you read up enough to understand why? When non CO2 driving factors have changed CO2 levels have changed in response which help to in-hence the initial changes. Just because CO2 has not traditionally been the initial driver of climate change does not mean it cannot be a driving factor in climate change. All scientists need to do is know the radiative physics which they do. Maybe you should ask them or read there material.

You demonstrate you do not understand how the earth can have higher levels of CO2 yet have colder conditions. I tried to get you to address these issues but you run away as usual.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past-intermediate.htm

Do you ever read anything or try to continue learning? Videos don't count.

[_The CCC]

LDSFAQ:

Irrelevant. Plants and animals were here long before humans, and will be here long after we've gone the way of the dinosaurs.

Not "irrelvant"..... Animals consume oxygen exactly the SAME as man (most).... thus if THEY survive and thrive, then so can man.
You people really don't think about what you're even saying.

My point is, 1000-4000 PPM through the earths history well supported LIFE just fine, thus human life can survive just fine when Co2 goes above it's current 400PPM which is utterly LOW compared to the earths history.

Man is the unnecessary ingredient. The Flintstones isn't a documentary. I have no desire to come across a living T-Rex. Jurassic World not withstanding.

Plants don't do better a higher concentrations of CO2.
SEE https://news.stanford.edu/pr/02/jasperplots124.html

Those periods also looked nothing like today's world.
SEE https://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past.htm