This is what actual "Inclusiveness" looks like.....

[_ldsfaqs]

Canadian children performed the same song for refugees that was sung to Mohamed when he sought refuge

http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/c ... paign=i100

Don't know all the details of who performed it, but it was likely related to the "public", at least certainly sponsored and promoted by Government....
If liberals were in charge however, they certainly wouldn't have done it for Christians.
After all, can't celebrate each others differences with Religion, Religious icons, decorations, Song, etc..... BANNING differences is the liberal version of being "inclusive", as I showed in two other posts, one thread I made and another Just Me made which she actually "praised" such "exclusionism" as being GOOD!

[_The CCC]

You're a bigot, and idiot. Syrians are Christian as well as Muslim. Further Canadians sing Christmas carols too.
SEE https://www.google.com/search?q=canadia ... 5S0dpvw%3D

[_Themis]

You're a bigot, and idiot. Syrians are Christian as well as Muslim. Further Canadians sing Christmas carols too.
SEE https://www.google.com/search?q=canadia ... 5S0dpvw%3D

Welcoming refugees is about as Christian as you can get faqs. What is the problem of welcoming these people who are from different religions or maybe not all that religious at all?

[_MissTish]

If liberals were in charge however, they certainly wouldn't have done it for Christians.

There were Christians in this first group of refugees to arrive in Canada.

These are the people you're so frightened of:

[_The CCC]

It was a wonderful gesture. We need more of them.

[_Blixa]

Canada just voted in a liberal government.

So "liberals" did do this for Christians.

[_just me]

It was a wonderful gesture. We need more of them.

Very beautiful. I hope all the refugees find *home* soon.

[_ldsfaqs]

Just wow..... You people are utterly mentally unstable.

I create a post specifically saying what "inclusiveness looks like", and contrasting to liberal fascism which "excludes" such things in the public square, and yet somehow I'm a "bigot" for promoting something good and showing liberals as evil for promoting bad things that would OUTLAW such displays.

Just phenominal.... Your hateful bigoted obssessions with me has gone full tilt.

[_Blixa]

Just wow..... You people are utterly mentally unstable.

I create a post specifically saying what "inclusiveness looks like", and contrasting to liberal fascism which "excludes" such things in the public square, and yet somehow I'm a "bigot" for promoting something good and showing liberals as evil for promoting bad things that would OUTLAW such displays.

Just phenominal.... Your hateful bigoted obssessions with me has gone full tilt.

You said "liberals" wouldn't do this for Christians, when in fact you posted about liberals doing that for Christians.

You pretty much trolled yourself.

[_ldsfaqs]

Just wow..... You people are utterly mentally unstable.

I create a post specifically saying what "inclusiveness looks like", and contrasting to liberal fascism which "excludes" such things in the public square, and yet somehow I'm a "bigot" for promoting something good and showing liberals as evil for promoting bad things that would OUTLAW such displays.

Just phenominal.... Your hateful bigoted obssessions with me has gone full tilt.

You said "liberals" wouldn't do this for Christians, when in fact you posted about liberals doing that for Christians.

You pretty much trolled yourself.

Liar as usual....

1. Just because there are Christians in the group doesn't mean most of the group wasn't Muslim.

2. I didn't say crap about Muslims or Christians in relation to my post subject.....

3. What I DID SAY is that liberals are "banning" such displays in the name of being "inclusive" when it's not being inclusive, especially if it concerns Christians or Christian display's.
Are you even reading anything posted here, or just see what you want to see?
I posted a thread that shows liberals not being "inclusive" with these kinds of things, and you all call banning this sort of thing being "inclusive".....
"Just Me" posts a thread showing the "banning" of things like this, and she praises it, and I show her hypocricy.

4. You don't know if it was "liberals" who did that Choir.
More importantly which is my point, is that it clearly was sponsored by the Government in some way, and according to liberals ALL "religious displays" be it singing, nativity, Christmas tree's etc. in Government in Schools, etc. SHOULD BE BANNED..... That's what you liberals say and want.

Every Christmas we see you Banning:
- The word Christmas
- Christmas Trees
- Christmas Decorations
- Christmas Songs
on and on and on.... ban ban ban.... it's all you people know. If you don't like something BAN IT!!!

But you're perfectly happy go lucky when it's done for something YOU WANT like in this case.

Anyway.... Like I said, that Choir is what ACTUAL "inclusiveness" looks like.... You liberals on the other hand are always trying to BAN such "displays" in the public square.
That's my point, pure and simple..... but not surprised you people don't get it. You're in your own little worlds instead of reality.