Concealed Carry Question

[_Lemmie]

I have NEVER said I don't name call. I said when I do, I only do it when I'm responding to the discussion also.
I don't just make a post name calling and personally attacking (99.9% of the time anyway), but you guys do all the time, some 95% of your posts are just personal attacks, just like several of the above. Many many posts with ZERO subject matter related to the discussion and what's said.

Why are liberals so morally and intellectually defective they see only "half truth", and then need to lie about it?

I can't believe you are repeating this lie in yet another thread! Here's my rebuttal to this EXACT SAME LIE you have tried elsewhere:

Further, I've NEVER "name called" first. You people personally attack me, and so I call you what you are.

So, when are you people going to stop lying?

It's just too easy to catch ldsfaqs in yet another lie. Here is the first sentence of just a single thread he has started recently. Note the "name calling" he starts with in his very first sentence, before anyone has even read or responded:

Nice exposing as usual of liberals, their double mindedness, their distortion, their calling good evil and evil good, etc.....

[_ldsfaqs]

And Blixa willfully lies yet again, seeing only half truth.

I have NEVER said I don't name call. I said when I do, I only do it when I'm responding to the discussion also.
I don't just make a post name calling and personally attacking (99.9% of the time anyway), but you guys do all the time, some 95% of your posts are just personal attacks, just like several of the above. Many many posts with ZERO subject matter related to the discussion and what's said.

Why are liberals so morally and intellectually defective they see only "half truth", and then need to lie about it?

Look in the mirror, friendo.

Everything you accuse others of is an accurate description of your own behavior.

You should do that, because everything you claim of me and conservatives actually applies to you, but doesn't in fact apply to us.

You're on the side of distortion, perversion, etc. of all things, not me.

I fully admit I'm critical.... but you people don't.
Further, I'm also only responding to what you people do, I'm a mirror of your own reflection, again, it's why I even post here, to show you what you do, what you create.

[_Jersey Girl]

You should do that, because everything you claim of me and conservatives actually applies to you, but doesn't in fact apply to us.

You're on the side of distortion, perversion, etc. of all things, not me.

I fully admit I'm critical.... but you people don't.
Further, I'm also only responding to what you people do, I'm a mirror of your own reflection, again, it's why I even post here, to show you what you do, what you create.

What do you mean, "me and conservatives"?

My god, you think you speak for conservatives? You're an embarrassment to conservatives.

[_MissTish]

You should do that, because everything you claim of me and conservatives actually applies to you, but doesn't in fact apply to us.

Stop doing this. Stop it right now.

You do not represent all conservatives, or most conservatives. You represent only yourself.

Many conservatives would seek to place distance between themselves and the viewpoints you espouse here.

We only represent ourselves in this world, so stop pretending that you are part of some imaginary 'we' or 'us'.

[_Lemmie]

You should do that, because everything you claim of me and conservatives actually applies to you, but doesn't in fact apply to us.

You're on the side of distortion, perversion, etc. of all things, not me.

I fully admit I'm critical.... but you people don't.
Further, I'm also only responding to what you people do, I'm a mirror of your own reflection, again, it's why I even post here, to show you what you do, what you create.

What do you mean, "me and conservatives"?

My god, you think you speak for conservatives? You're an embarrassment to conservatives.

He's an embarrassment to every group-look how many groups have been listed here that he's been kicked out of.

My real worry is that he may actually try to carry a concealed weapon- he considers himself a 'Porter Rockwell,' only 'better,' in his words.

[_Gadianton]

...and you simply "happened" to rest your hand on your gun simply to rest it which is something carry people do all the time, resting their hands on their gun if standing around,

Huh. So you're saying people who carry stand around in public places and rest a hand on the hilt of their weapon, to take a load off, as it were, as they shoot the breeze? Are you planning on resting your hand on the hilt of your gun in public when you get your permit for the sake of relaxation?

[_Blixa]

Look in the mirror, friendo.

Everything you accuse others of is an accurate description of your own behavior.

You should do that, because everything you claim of me and conservatives actually applies to you, but doesn't in fact apply to us.

You're on the side of distortion, perversion, etc. of all things, not me.

You didn't even process what I wrote if your comeback is a swift, "nuh uh, you are!"

As several others have pointed out, you seem to be operating from within a fantasy where you speak for a monolithic "us" of conservatives and against an equally monolithic "you all" of liberals. This is not remotely real or accurate. You no more speak for or represent "conservatives" than the aggregate posters here represent "liberalism."

I fully admit I'm critical.... but you people don't.

I can barely hazard a guess what you mean here, but here goes. No you are not "critical." What you write isn't criticism and it's sure as hell not critique. It's simple reaction. A knee jerk, emotional response with no thought, no shape, no conceptual development.

I don't know why you would accuse me (or others) of not admitting to being critical. I reckon a good 90+ percent of the posts on this board are critical of Mormonism in some fashion (this is not an endorsement of this criticism either, as I most often don't agree with the majority of posts the board. My interest in Mormonism is historical; the vagaries of the current institution in Salt Lake is not of much interest to me).

It's very odd, as a life long academic, to be accused of not "admitting" to criticality. Most of what I've published could loosely be called criticism. Furthermore, I teach criticism. I teach critique. In my upper division and graduate courses, I regularly take students through immanent critique, ideology critique, materialist critique and dialectical critique using the works of both 19th and 20th century philosophers and cultural theorists (one of whom, the astonishingly eclectic Jewish Marxist, Walter Benjamin was the subject of some of your plagiarizing).

Further, I'm also only responding to what you people do, I'm a mirror of your own reflection, again, it's why I even post here, to show you what you do, what you create.

Saying "I'm a mirror of your own reflection" is redundant. Mirrors reflect. It's what they do. But beyond this, it's good evidence of how you don't provide criticism, you merely react. If you took a moment to think, to re-read what you write, to care about how you communicate, you wouldn't write foolish phrases like that.

Anyway, this is getting tiresome.

Happy Holidays, ldsfaqs. I hope you have a Merry Christmas and find peace and clarity.