The FBI comes out, issues warrants for various people, then at one point a group is peacefully going to a meeting, they are stopped, then continue, and then they are ran off the road, you can even see an officer actually run at the car as if he's intentionally trying to get himself run over. They then proceed to shoot the car up the heck, and use all kinds of other things, the passengers in the car do nothing but try not to get shot. The driver then comes out with his hands up, according to witnesses he's shot, and then that is when he put's his hands down, though the first might have been to simply steddy himself, ends up he's shot 9 times. So, deadly force and the force of law is used against peaceful freedom loving people.
In contrast....
Liberals primarily in the form of Occupy Wallstreet and/or the Wisconsin protests, take over government property and grounds, even fully taking over the Capital building itself, sleeping there, etc. They, were not armed, but the shear "number" of people made it so the government couldn't do anything. It occurs right in downtown areas, thus they are entirely interferring with public use and movement, they do some 1 Million in damage and other related costs because of their occupying.
The only thing the FBI does is investigate threats to Politicians. Nobody is shot, there is some minor police abusing authority, but it's people no different than Oregon taking over government property to have their views heard.
Conclusion....
As can be seen, this is a clear example of how liberals have permiated the government, and because the "cause" isn't their values and agenda, they willfully use deadly force, as well as engage in "criminal" charges against the protestors in Oregon, but when Liberals protest and occupy, they do nothing. They don't issue arrest warrents for the "leaders"..... they don't try to shoot them and even do shoot them and kill them.
So, tell us again how liberals aren't Fascists.....? They just used deadly force against peaceful protestors, yet if it was liberals, you all would be entirely against it. But because it's a conservative cause, land rights, and government abuse of power against land owners and users of public lands, you liberals think it's perfectly fine for calling them "Terrorists" and thinking they should be arrested and even killed. You all even PRAISE that one was killed and they were arrested. Why aren't Liberal occupiers "terrorists"? Why don't liberal leaders etc. deserve to be arrested and killed? Because they weren't armed? Being armed is a Constitutional and Civil Right..... so that's not an excuse. Because they tried to kill government leaders....? They threatened to kill? Nope.... ONLY in self defense yes they postured. But they did nothing and said nothing that would require the usage of deadly force or needing to be arrested. They said and did ZERO different from liberal protesters...... the only difference is they were armed, and stated their willingness to defend their liberty if shot at first. Absolutely nothing else was different in their protesting compared with Liberal protesting other than subject matter. They were driving to a public meeting for crying out loud, and they didn't even actually defend themselves when they were being shot at, being in a tin can, thus clearly they weren't intent on killing anyone..... Only the Government was intent on killing someone, and they did.....
Liberalism is evil..... and this shows it clear as day.
by the way..... Any good law enforcement officer doesn't shoot someone just because they move a certain way, IF he was supposedly reaching down.
They wait for the person to actually have a WEAPON IN HAND or they see it being nearly in hand....! Which that good Mormon man didn't at all.
Note how it's convenient they didn't release "sound"? Note also with all the video there, they only release an at distance can't bearly tell anything video, instead of dash cams, person cams, etc.? Note how at one point in the video you see them pumping rounds into the front windshield clearly attempting to kill the occupants, and according to the witnesses there, lots more rounds hit the truck as well that he was shot in cold blood?
(the above text image was made by an old man, thus forgive his spelling/typing skills, got if off a Youtube video somewhere out there)
Video which shares some of this thoughts well before this..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EWfGtQvyb4
------
Update, answers to some of the comments below....
Sure they broke the law in the act of Protesting.... which is American as Apple Pie.
Protesting has NEVER required "violent governmental force" unless it's a Fascist government (such as what historically has been done against blacks or other country's actions against people), or the Protesters are harming others such as the Whiskey Rebellion.
Liberals were not made "criminals" when they Illegally Occupied and did damage intentionally to the Wisconsin Capital Building or Federal Property, in contrast to the Bundy's who was simply doing maintenance adjustments to the Refuge property so vehicles could get through etc.
(And FYI in case you don't get it, staying there overnight when it's supposed to be closed is ILLEGAL occupying, the Refuge is sometimes open also, so just because the Capital Building is sometimes open doesn't make it any less illegal for them to occupy).
Liberals were not made criminals when they've occupied other things illegally such as Occupy Wallstreet.
The only differences between the Bundy's and liberals were the Bundy's were nicer about it and cleaner, they protested out in the middle of know-where so they didn't interfere with peoples lives as much as possible, and they were armed for self defense period.
Yet, in the liberal fascist mind, can't have conservatives protesting..... They must be shut down by the state!
