Clinton's emails a problem, even if NO classified information

[_theldsthinker]

When all of her e-mails become public, perhaps we find a 47% comment by Hillary.
Perhaps we find that Hillary Clinton did a lot of favors for Goldman Sachs, or even for foreign governments.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html

That will be a disaster, please don't let her win the nomination.

"Why Clinton Vs Trump Is A Nightmare Scenario"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK6oBX56j7w

[_The CCC]

8 Congressional hearings and big fat 0. Internal State Department review big fat 0, Justice Department big fat 0. Colin Powell did the same. Republicans big fat 0's.

[_theldsthinker]

8 Congressional hearings and big fat 0. Internal State Department review big fat 0, Justice Department big fat 0. Colin Powell did the same. Republicans big fat 0's.

congressional hearings don't change the fact that she receives Wall Street donations. She flip-flops too much on the issues, we don't know the real Hillary Clinton. Her voting record is hawkish.

[_ajax18]

congressional hearings don't change the fact that she receives Wall Street donations. She flip-flops too much on the issues, we don't know the real Hillary Clinton. Her voting record is hawkish.

Why does that mean she should be indicted for her gross mishandling of classified information?

Colin Powell did the same. Republicans big fat 0's

Then throw him in jail as well. I don't remember Colin Powell lying about it. A lot of people have gone to jail for doing similar things to what Hillary did. She'll get a pass because the Democrats control the Justice Department.

[_The CCC]

8 Congressional hearings and big fat 0. Internal State Department review big fat 0, Justice Department big fat 0. Colin Powell did the same. Republicans big fat 0's.

congressional hearings don't change the fact that she receives Wall Street donations. She flip-flops too much on the issues, we don't know the real Hillary Clinton. Her voting record is hawkish.

So? There is no law against taking Wall Street contributions. In fact it was Jesse Unruh who famously said: "If you can’t take their money, drink their whiskey, screw their women, and vote against ‘em anyway, you don’t belong in the Legislature”

So do you refuse to change your mind when presented with new facts?

by the way I'm no fan of Hilary. I plan on voting for Green Party Jill Stein a Jewish woman in the California Primary.

[_theldsthinker]

by the way I'm no fan of Hilary. I plan on voting for Green Party Jill Stein a Jewish woman in the California Primary.

We have Bernie, there is no need for the Green Party!

"So? There is no law against taking Wall Street contributions."

True, but it means that Hillary works for Wall Street. She should admit that

[_ldsfaqs]

Not just "classified" information, but "Secret" also....

[_The CCC]

Not just "classified" information, but "Secret" also....

Incorrect. It was classified after release. To prosecute her now would be a Ex Post Facto infringement.

[_The CCC]

by the way I'm no fan of Hilary. I plan on voting for Green Party Jill Stein a Jewish woman in the California Primary.

We have Bernie, there is no need for the Green Party!

"So? There is no law against taking Wall Street contributions."

True, but it means that Hillary works for Wall Street. She should admit that

I have nothing against Bernie, I just prefer Jill of the Green Party.

How can you tell if a politician is lying. Their mouths are moving.

[_theldsthinker]

I have nothing against Bernie, I just prefer Jill of the Green Party.

The Green Party will have a chance after corporate money is out of politics.
Please support Sanders, if he wins the two party system will end.